[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test Results Unveiled
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test Results Unveiled
- From: Chuck Hutton <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 05:03:36 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Authentication-results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 25.152.64.58) smtp.mailfrom=msn.com; hard-core-dx.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none; hard-core-dx.com; dmarc=fail action=none header.from=msn.com;
- Content-language: en-US
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHRnBGcltjiYM2vMU+j9KwTI2D+Vp+VbSCAgAAClcw=
- Thread-topic: [IRCA] All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test Results Unveiled
Yes, desired to undesired is often-used nomenclature in the communications world.
I don't see how you can correlate hybrid IBOC to all digital IBOC. What you hear with KRKO/KAST is different from what you will hear
with all digital as the power spectrum and subcarrier levels are vastly different.
Chuck
________________________________________
From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 4:51 AM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] All-Digital AM Co-Channel Lab Test Results Unveiled
I presume "D/U" abbreviation in this piece refers to "desired / undesired"?
I wonder if someone recorded audio from those tests, rather than just
tossing dB's around? I have a recording of KAST-1370 from this
morning that says otherwise, with KRKO-1380 IBOC sidebands about 25dB
down and....welll, KAST is readable, but I wouldn't say it's lacking
interference. The noise becomes really dominant if KAST is less
than ~15dB above the IBOC level.
best wishes,
Nick
At 21:05 21-04-16, you wrote:
>http://www.radioworld.com/article/all-digital-am-co-channel-lab-test-results-unveiled/278670
>
>Sent from my iPad
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
>Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up.
>Registration info:
>http://www.nrcdxas.org
>
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up.
Registration info:
http://www.nrcdxas.org
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Be sure to register now for the Joint DX Convention
Kansas City, September 9 to 11. Hotel space is filling up.
Registration info:
http://www.nrcdxas.org
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx