[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] "Star Wars" Shootout-- Sony ICF-S5 "Superstar" Vs. "Science Fiction PL-380"
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] "Star Wars" Shootout-- Sony ICF-S5 "Superstar" Vs. "Science Fiction PL-380"
- From: d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2016 20:27:16 +0000 (UTC)
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20140121; t=1456691357; bh=3NXzjqmsL4pfzYigEy2swFDI9iHDnu4MMQUzLYEH5w0=; h=Received:Received:Date:From:To:Message-ID:Subject:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=dAGsIC988ZXAq9ocGwfDWFl6niLv/5aeCsO+yoPPC5rC6aLvNYkefFtmXQ3fPaNQy WumVM/UjbKFA5yUvJYyIlS0aIx4QCViB6dyScuUZkl/wfgfs80MiGiOzAbMVb7KQwZ W69/TBMtmFz0ikGKKdgdSMQ6E16lZrbvcw7/CAweRN98uh0ziv3Slw3hy3jGgrVCk/ KCGEJvNRxwHHBdLMbCsVDMHaaO80Zaot/NKlx3rsHucw4SBzM6mNmKT88+FAyRGYzm ikipz22iLvfTz1deJXYGtTT90QttSo+R86EUPSeLmIP1TrDTylVWkJ1C7mVZiNyRPe RJ6yO7pkYBNVg==
- Thread-index: nZM/FfL2g3JHS2lLIeSXfFRfUwOtWA==
- Thread-topic: "Star Wars" Shootout-- Sony ICF-S5 "Superstar" Vs. "Science Fiction PL-380"
Thanks Nick,
Â
The wimpy signal from 1070-CFAX to the SE is actually a boon for fanatical antenna experimenters 100 miles away :-) It has provided a nice,Âghostlike daytime DX signal for all kinds of bizarre A/B antenna tests for over 8 years.
Â
Some of the daytime DX signals from BC (like 730 and 1130) are way too strong to be of any use in antenna testing. CFAX is just barely there-- wimpy enough to be an ideal target!
Â
73, Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nick Hall-Patch" <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2016 7:23:49 AM
Subject: Re: [IRCA] "Star Wars" Shootout-- Sony ICF-S5 "Superstar" Vs. "Science Fiction PL-380"
We should work out how much of CFAX's 10 kw goes in your direction
Gary. Â It's highly directional away from you, so is much better
daytime DX than the power rating sounds like.
best wishes,
Nick
> > On Feb 27, 2016, at 8:20 PM, d1028gary@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > The Sony ICF-S5 classic portable from 1980 has the reputation of
> being one of the most sensitive AM-DXing portables ever
> manufactured. Roughly equivalent in sensitivity to the Panasonic
> RF-2200, it was the Japanese-market equivalent of the legendary
> ICF-S5W portable-- which usually commands hundreds of dollars
> during the rare occasions when it is offered on eBay. Back in 1980,
> the ICF-S5 was marketed in Japan by Sony with the nickname of "The Superstar."
> >
> > The all-new 3" Bar FSL Tecsun PL-380 model has its own advantage,
> however-- a transplanted FSL antenna enhancing its own AM
> sensitivity up to a phenomenal level. Of course it also has DSP
> selectivity, 500 memories, multiple digital search functions and
> other 21st century refinements-- but such concepts were only
> "wishful thinking" back in 1980.
> >
> > See how these two awesome AM-DXing portables shake out in the
> daytime DX reception of 1070-CFAX (10 kW at 99 miles) in the new
> video posted at
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VY9u8MReGjk&feature=youtu.be Â. The
> link for the "Heathkit-like" full construction article is also included.
> >
> > 73 and Good DX,
> > Gary DeBock (in Puyallup, WA, USA)
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of
> the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the
> opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx