Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] 1500khz Mystery Station

[Forrester S <jesuslovesftssd@xxxxxxxxx>]

Well I realize this may not be in the proper vicinity but just throwing a
thought out there but what about Doniphan Mo? On again off again station
maybe creating these noises. Just a thought, that is all. As I say in
certain groups, take what you want and leave the rest.

Todd Skaine
Bloomington M
On Feb 12, 2016 8:08 AM, "Les Rayburn" <les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I highly suspect that the culprit will turn out to be a station with a
> daytime only authorization. Their transmitterâs high voltage section would
> usually remain on and that may be what is radiating. Chances are the
> engineer would be completely unaware of the problem unless they monitoring
> the frequency at night after the stationâs automation decreased power
> and/or shut off the exciter section.
>
> A daytime check of the transmitter during itâs normal operating hours
> would likely reveal nothing amiss.
>
> Did he verify that situation during the night time hours? I start hearing
> this within a half hour of my local, WQCR powering off for the evening.
> Note, even though WQCR has a small nighttime authorization, they power down
> completely at night. Iâve driven to their transmitter site and verified
> that they are not the culprit.
>
>
> 73,
>
> Les Rayburn, N1LF
> 121 Mayfair Park
> Maylene, AL
> EM63nf
>
> Member WTFDA, IRCA, NRC. Former CPC Chairman for NRC & IRCA.
>
> Elad FDM-S2 SDR, AirSpy SDR, Quantum Phaser, Wellbrook ALA1530 Loop,
> Wellbrook Flag, Clifton Labs Active Whip.
>
>
> > On Feb 12, 2016, at 2:02 AM, Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
> walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > He's the stations chief engineer, a friend of mine for several years.. I
> > texted him late one night, he checked the next morning.
> >
> > Paul
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 10:30 PM, Chuck Hutton <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Paul -
> >>
> >> So you called the guy. How was he able to give a definitive answer over
> >> the phone? Without further details, it seems like he said "no" without
> any
> >> evidence. Or maybe parts of the story were left out???
> >>
> >> Chuck
> >>
> >> ________________________________________
> >> From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Paul B. Walker,
> >> Jr. <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 10:27 PM
> >> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
> >> Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] 1500khz Mystery Station
> >>
> >> I can confirm it is NOT WKAX Russellvile, AL. I spoke to their engineer
> >> today... So without going back to see if that's directly in the path
> and in
> >> consideration, we can rule it out.
> >>
> >> Paul
> >>
> >> On Wednesday, February 10, 2016, Robert LaFore <rdlafore@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> For mine (320 from Acworth GA) Magnetic----
> >>>
> >>> On 2/9/2016 10:41 PM, Chuck Hutton wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> That is always true for loop antennas. There's no reason to even
> mention
> >>>> the maximum. The null is sharp (narrow) and deep and there fore easily
> >>>> detected. The peak is extremely broad and you won't see a difference
> if
> >> you
> >>>> are off by 20, 30 or more degrees.
> >>>>
> >>>> Now if I only knew if people were using magnetic or true north......
> >>>>
> >>>> Chuck
> >>>>
> >>>> ________________________________________
> >>>> From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Kevin
> Redding <
> >>>> dc2daylight@xxxxxxxxx>
> >>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2016 3:26 AM
> >>>> To: Glenn Hauser; Mailing list for the International Radio Club of
> >> America
> >>>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] 1500khz Mystery Station
> >>>>
> >>>> As I was taught in the Navy....
> >>>>
> >>>> You find the signal. Then you rotate the antenna for minimum signal.
> >> That
> >>>> is the direction the sending station is located.
> >>>>
> >>>> Kevin
> >>>> Crump, TN
> >>>>
> >>>> On Feb 9, 2016, at 6:27 PM, Glenn Hauser via IRCA wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> This is getting more and more confusing. Tom, do you mean then that
> the
> >>>>> maximum signal would be 90 degrees away from 170, i.e., 80 / 260
> >> degrees,
> >>>>> or do you mean that 170 degrees is the direxion of the maximum, not
> >> minimum
> >>>>> signal?
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> IRCA mailing list
> >>>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>>>
> >>>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >>>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> the
> >>>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>>>
> >>>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>>>
> >>>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> IRCA mailing list
> >>>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>>>
> >>>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >>>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> the
> >>>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>>>
> >>>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>>>
> >>>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> IRCA mailing list
> >>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>>
> >>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>>
> >>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>>
> >>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>>
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx