Re: [IRCA] 1500 KHz "Mystery Station"

[Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx>]

To each his own and not to criticize in any way, but if I can't hear at
least trace audio that I am sure is from the station, I can't count it as
logged.

73 KAZ

On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Les Rayburn <les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Neil,
>
> Thanks for passing along that information.
>
> This is also possibly an opportunity to log a new station, depending on
> how you chose to interpret an ID. If weâre able to narrow the problem now
> to a single station, report it to their ownership or CE and the problem
> gets corrected, then anyone who logged the âwarblerâ can state for certain
> that they logged that station.
>
> Not to mention that the problem makes it difficult to DX an otherwise
> productive channel (at least here)
>
> A few years ago, I remember KFI in Los Angeles had a problem with drift in
> their transmitter. Looking at it on a waterfall display, itâs carrier stood
> out like a sore thumb from all others on the channel.
>
> Now in Europe, some MW DXâer carefully measure frequency offsets of
> broadcast carriers and will count viewing a carrier at that precise offset
> as a logging. I personally donât agree with that but donât fault anyone who
> wants to do so. Each DXâer has to set his own standards for what counts as
> a logging.
>
> Despite that, I did count the KFI drifting carrier as a loggingâand put a
> JPEG screen capture of the waterfall display in that listing of my Excel
> log. Itâs also noted in the remarks column. I hope someday to capture a
> full audio ID from KFI, but until then, I still count that one in my
> logbook.
>
> Why? Because the drifting carrier was positively identified has belonging
> to KFI and it could have been no other station. It was received at my
> station, so itâs a logging. (In my book)
>
> The same would be true of this mystery signal on 1500. If we can narrow it
> down to the responsible station, then itâs a logging. Knowing my luck, I
> already have them in the logâ :-)
>
> I have similar ârulesâ for loggings from the car radio. On AM, they have
> to be received while the vehicle is within a 5 mile radius of my home. On
> FM, I count any new logging made within my grid square, EM63. This is a
> much larger range, but on VHF, we base a lot of stuff off grid squaresâso
> itâs easier for me.
>
> Each DXâers ruleâs vary, which is fine.
>
> Plus who doesnât love a good mystery? This is like a Scooby Doo episode
> for grown-ups!
>
>
> 73,
>
> Les Rayburn, N1LF
> 121 Mayfair Park
> Maylene, AL
> EM63nf
>
> Member WTFDA, IRCA, NRC. Former CPC Chairman for NRC & IRCA.
>
> Elad FDM-S2 SDR, AirSpy SDR, Quantum Phaser, Wellbrook ALA1530 Loop,
> Wellbrook Flag, Clifton Labs Active Whip.
>
>
> > On Feb 5, 2016, at 2:42 PM, Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > I'll stress two things, 1) This doesn't sound like a typical Cuban
> warbler
> > but is simply badly noise on the sidebands from some tx issue.
> >
> > 2) This has been going on since mid fall.
> >
> > 73 KAZ
> >
> > On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:02 PM, R. Colin Newell <coffeecanuck@xxxxxxxxx>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>>
> >>> Not wanting to miss out on the 1500 kHz action, I checked it out last
> >>> night after 0600 UTC --
> >>
> >>
> >> There are certainly one or two odd things there - I might be getting
> traces
> >> of IBOC from someone but
> >> I did hear what sounded like a 500 hz warble that was pretty steady.
> >>
> >> Drake R8 Receiver -   FLG100 W/NW Flag and E/W Wellbrook ALA100 into a
> >> Ratzlaff/Misek/Lanford Phaser (heretofore to be known as the RML
> Phaser!)
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Colin Newell - Editor and creator *of *Coffeecrew.com
> >> <http://www.Coffeecrew.com> and DXer.ca <http://www.DXer.ca> -
> >> VA7WWV | Twitter @CoffeeCrew | Victoria - Canada
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx