Re: [IRCA] WBOB Question

[James Renfrew <jim.renfrew@xxxxxxxxx>]

I did not know about the plan to use different power levels for the test.
 but after 12:30 or so the test was significantly weaker.  There were also
a few moments, 12:13, 12:14, when some sort of call-in program discussing
Egyptian Copts burst in.  These were not fade-ups, but a "toggle effect"
from the test sweeps to the call-in and then back out.  Jim Renfrew

On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> That's a possibility I hadn't considered, but given what I heard, that
> would fit, and the plan was that they would alternate power.
>
> Thanks-
>
> Russ Edmunds
> 15 mi NW Phila
> Grid FN20id
> <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (2) barefoot w/whip
> FM: Yamaha T-80 & T-85, each w/ Conrad RDS Decoder;
> Onkyo T-450RDS; Tecsun PL-310 ( 2);
> modified Sony ICF2010 w/APS9B @ 15';
> Grundig G8 w/whip; modified Sony ICF2010 w/whip
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 7:51 AM, Rob Keeney <rkeeneybbq@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Russ,
> >
> > Early in the testing period it sounded like the test programming was
> > covered by a strong OC.  The Batchelor show would come back in place of
> the
> > OC.  I thought maybe WBOB had 2 transmitters on at the same time.
> >
> > Rob Keeney
> > Goose Creek SC
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 10, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Russ Edmunds <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > During the course of the test there were times when WBOB clearly broke
> > from
> > > its SRN programming to run test material, however other times when they
> > > appeared to run the tones, sweeps, etc. along with/through the SRN
> talk.
> > >
> > > Did others observe this ? Or was there someone else in there running
> SRN
> > > programming ? None of the listed SRN stations on 600 would appear
> likely,
> > > so I'm inclined to believe that they did mix it up in this way....
> > >
> > >
> > > Russ Edmunds
> > > 15 mi NW Phila
> > > Grid FN20id
> > > <wb2bjh@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > AM: Modified Sony ICF2010's (2) barefoot w/whip
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx