[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] DKAZ Antenna



So is the minima actually moving or is the rear-response beamwidth changing? Or is that the same thing? And Nick: (especially in your 1640/1680 example), might there be some skywave in the mix? Makes an Old Novice wonder...

KAZ YOUR THOUGHTS ???  ALSO...SEE LAST PARAGRAPH BELOW


Mark Durenberger, in search of better understanding



-----Original Message----- From: Nick Hall-Patch

NICK 1: I haven't had experience with two D-Kaz Mark, but do I gather then that you haven't seen evidence of null steering with the DKaz alone? MARK 1: I HAVEN'T SEEN EVIDENCE OF STEERING, JUST DEPTH ADJUSTMENT (PRESUMABLY INCLUDING RE-SHAPING OF SIDE-LOBES). MARK 2: AND I COULD BE WRONG ABOUT THIS.

NICK 2: I'm not sure my use of "null steering" is entirely the correct term, even for the Flag. The direction for minimum signal response moves with adjustment of the termination (especially for vertical polarization), but the depth of the null is not ( ) as great as the best null obtained directly off the back of the antenna. MARK 2: NICK, I'M NOT CERTAIN THIS IS PROVED. DATA! MORE DATA!!!

NICK 1: I had observed similar (and <900 ohms) termination values for Portland on 1190 and Seattle on 1000, one 50 degrees off the back of the antenna, one 30 degrees, but realize that although Portland on 620 and and Seattle on 710 also had similar values of termination, that value was higher. And to throw it all out, Portland area on1640 and Seattle on different values of termination altogether.

NICK 1: Now I think of it however, doesn't the fact that 1640 and 1680 had different termination resistances for best nulls show a type of "null steering" (or ?). In both cases, the null was around -25dB, and the difference in termination resistance was a couple of hundred ohms. MARK 2: WOW THAT'S A LOT OF CHANGE.

. NICK 1: I had no reference right off the back of the antenna at those frequencies, but I assume that both values of termination resistance couldn't have each been appropriate for the deepest null off the back of the antenna.

MARK 2: I MAY HAVE A LOT OF FIELD TIME NEXT WEEK AND CAN TAKE MEASUREMENTS FROM 280 DEGREES AND FROM 325 DEGREES. CAN YOU SUGGEST A SERIES OF MEASUREMENTS THAT MIGHT MOVE OUR DISCUSSION FORWARD?DX

best wishes,

Nick


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx