[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] [ABDX] WH2XDE digital tests imminent circa 1750 kHz
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] [ABDX] WH2XDE digital tests imminent circa 1750 kHz
- From: neilkaz <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 14:15:01 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=B09s1MSPDX/zz53wD6hUSBQ61m7ZQuDgpWDhIkInulNMustwVXYkaOLdjDxzTXcu; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Cc:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP;
For me, this is outside the AM band and won't count as a new AM stn. Just my opinion. 73 KAZ
-----Original Message-----
>From: Les Rayburn <les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Sent: Oct 15, 2014 8:29 PM
>To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] [ABDX] WH2XDE digital tests imminent circa 1750 kHz
>
>I hate to rain on the parade, but does this even qualify as broadcast
>band DX? I mean it's at 1750 KHz, well outside the band, and seems to
>have little to do with broadcast
>technology---except perhaps another "pie in the sky" idea about how
>digital modulation is going to save AM radio.
>
>Forget about the 100+ million installed user base of analog radios, and
>the fact that the market is moving towards on-demand audio content
>delivery services like Pandora, and away from broadcasting, period.
>
>Hard to get excited about logging this one.
>
>--
>73,
>
>Les Rayburn, N1LF
>121 Mayfair Park
>Maylene, AL 35114
>EM63nf
>
>6M VUCC #1712
>AMSAT #38965
>Grid Bandits #222
>Southeastern VHF Society
>Central States VHF Society Life Member
>Six Club #2484
>
>Active on 6 Meters thru 1296, 10GHz & Light
>
>
>
>
>
>On 10/15/2014 6:42 PM, Tim Tromp wrote:
>> 2332 UTC: AM carrier noted right now on 1750 kHz with some test tones
>> and brief modulated CW heard.
>>
>> 73,
>> Tim Tromp
>> West Michigan
>>
>>
>> On 10/15/2014 02:40 PM, Glenn Hauser wghauser@xxxxxxxxx [ABDX] wrote:
>>>
>>> ** U S A. Experimental station WH2XDE will start testing next week
>>> (October 13). Tests will be in digital audio modes which will be
>>> announced before each transmission in AM with descriptions of the
>>> particular mode and how to demodulate it. Private monitor points have
>>> been set up but SWL and Amateur reports are welcome [wh2xde @
>>> gmail.com]. The first few days may involve only carrier and CW IDâs
>>> however to allow for transmitter/antenna adjustment.
>>>
>>> Start Time: 0000 UT (later times may be added if needed due to
>>> propagation)
>>> Duration: 2 hours approx.
>>> Frequency: 1750 kHz
>>> Power level: 1 kW (AM carrier); Digital 1-5 kW
>>> Transmitter Location: New York (WH2XDE-1)
>>> Antenna: Loaded vertical (less than 1/4wave) or a full wave horizontal
>>> loop
>>> Transmitter: Armstrong X1000B
>>> (Jerry Whitney, Kestrel Electronic Design, Oct 9, DX LISTENING DIGEST)
>>>
>>> Jerry, Tnx for the info. Please keep me informed about further
>>> developments. I assume reports may be sent to this e-mail address? Is
>>> there a postal address? Is there a website for more info? 73, (Glenn
>>> Hauser, to Jerry via DXLD)
>>>
>>> Glenn, Thanks for your interest. Yes, reports can be sent to this
>>> email address. The postal address is: Jerry Whitney, WH2XDE, 2083
>>> Stirnie Rd., Victor NY 14564.
>>>
>>> I will mail (USPS) out a QSL card to anyone who requests one (no SASE
>>> needed). The QSL shows a picture of the rather large 1 wavelength
>>> horizontal loop and ATU. No website, I can email site pictures etc. to
>>> anyone who is interested however.
>>>
>>> The digital voice modes currently are a work in progress. Very
>>> disappointing! Static crashes, selective fading and the transmitter
>>> requirements are frustrating. (10db of headroom is needed on the
>>> transmitter for peak power output; a 500 watt transmitter needs 5 kW
>>> peak to properly modulate!) The solution may be in the receiver. The
>>> primary digital mode will likely be DRM with the new low latency
>>> compression scheme. I will operate some of the ham modes (FreeDV)
>>> also.
>>>
>>> If there is enough response from listening stations I will probably
>>> setup a website with transmission schedules, pictures etc. I'll keep
>>> you updated. Try Wednesday 10/15 at 0000 UT and beyond. It should be
>>> fully operational then.
>>>
>>> I forgot to ask you if you had any thoughts on the frequency of
>>> operation. The plan was to use 1750 kHz but the license allows 1720-
>>> 1800. The band segment in this part of the US is quiet with only a few
>>> very weak 9 kHz spaced stations from Europe when propagation is
>>> exceptional. Thanks 73 (Jerry Whitney, DX LISTENING DIGEST)
>>>
>>> Jerry, I checked the 1711-1800 range a few times last night, and hear
>>> nothing but some weak carriers, maybe out of local devices. 1750
>>> itself seems quite clear. Are you referring to AM broadcasters from
>>> Europe? Must be pirates, but most of them are below 1700, as licensed
>>> broadcasting there still stops at 1602, and I would not expect them to
>>> stick to 9-kHz spacing.
>>>
>>> What kind of programming will there be? What is your ultimate
>>> objective after these tests? (Glenn to Jerry, via DXLD)
>>>
>>> Glenn, Thanks for your input. I'll stick to 1750 for now. I ran some
>>> antenna tests this weekend and wasn't happy with the antenna
>>> bandwidth so more work will be needed. This will delay the startup
>>> for perhaps a week. I will email you when it`s ready.
>>>
>>> Not much thought on programming yet, still some technical details to
>>> work on. I suppose I could transmit "World of Radio" on AM if I had
>>> permission!
>>>
>>> As you likely know, there are some clever new "digital data" methods
>>> developed in the last few years by some of the telecom companies or
>>> their licensed partners. These digital data streams are very
>>> impressive but require a robust connection. I'm working on several of
>>> the licensed data systems and trying to "adapt" them to medium wave
>>> broadcast. I'm most interested in what happens after the transmitter.
>>> The digital magic is done by people much smarter than I. 73 (Jerry
>>> Whitney, WH2XDE, Oct 13, DX LISTENING DIGEST)
>>>
>>> Glenn, Antenna looks good so I will start tests tonight (Wednesday at
>>> 2345 UT) carrier and MCW at 1000 watts. Frequency between 1730 and
>>> 1760. 73 (Jerry Whitney, Oct 15, DX LISTENING DIGEST)
>>>
>>> Googled the calls to see if it's real (yes) and look at these pages
>>> on the below link. A couple of entries in the lower bands through SW
>>> for other mostly digital noise experiments, too:
>>> http://www.fcc.gov/document/experimental-grants-4114-43014
>>> (Terry L Krueger, FL, DX LISTENING DIGEST) i.e. on third page of four:
>>>
>>> KESTREL ELECTRONIC DESIGN LLC
>>> 0167-EX-PL-2014
>>> WH2XDE
>>>
>>> New experimental to operate in 1.72-1.8 MHz for testing the next
>>> generation of digital audio transmission over radio
>>> Fixed: Victor (Ontario), NY; Penn Yan (Yates), NY (via DXLD)
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
>> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx