Re: [IRCA] CQ Communications & The idea of merging NRC/IRCA
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] CQ Communications & The idea of merging NRC/IRCA



As far as the financial point goes, it is better to have a club that offers the alternative of a $10 annual subscription for those who are on a severe budget.  I'm not sure what the minimum subscription is these days for DX news, but I'm sure it is significantly higher. Perhaps by that logic, IRCA should become the parent club in the proposed merger! 

By the east/west comment, I don't mean to suggest that either club only focuses its attention on one region. Over the years the membership demographic has just fallen into place that way. I'm very interested in reading for instance, about the various receptions of the recent Kentucky DX test on 1450. While it is virtually impossible to log that here in CA, I still like to know that folks in many states back east did indeed pick it up. 

You may wish to try convincing other IRCA board members of your vision, but I believe we are all in solidarity on this. 

And for those who fly the Confederate flag, I support their pride in their heritage.  

ms

> Date: Thu, 13 Mar 2014 14:00:48 -0500
> From: les@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To: mikesanburn@xxxxxxxxxxx; am@xxxxxxxxxxx; irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] CQ Communications & The idea of merging NRC/IRCA
> 
> I was honestly not aware that the IRCA focused on the West Coast, and 
> the NRC focused on the East Coast. Again, this may have been more 
> obvious at some point in the club's histories, but it's hardly the case 
> today. The growth of the Internet for communications have all but 
> removed any trace of "regionalism" from this hobby. True, I often ignore 
> some of the more hardcore TA and TP loggings and information, but 
> otherwise, I'm interested in what folks are hearing all over the country.
> 
> I think that pooling resources would help to delay the erosion of the 
> hobby in several significant ways:
> 
> 1.) Volunteer pool: Where overlap does exist, a merged club would only 
> need one volunteer to handle CPC duties, editorial column duties, Board 
> of Director duties, etc. The pool of volunteers is shrinking along with 
> our membership. Duplication of effort just doesn't make sense.
> 
> 2.) Time: Think about how much time we all spend sending out duplicate 
> log reports or DX tips to multiple e-mail lists. The same people are 
> subscribed to all of them or at least most. It's unnecessary and a waste 
> of time.
> 
> 3.) One Stop Shopping: A unified club would be a much stronger voice to 
> advocate our interests to broadcasters, the FCC, ARRL, and other 
> organizations that make common-sense partnerships. It would allow those 
> interested in the hobby to have a single source of information.
> 
> 4.) Financial: As more members age, and begin to live on fixed incomes, 
> we must all take a look at our hobby expenses. Club membership is not 
> very expensive, but the costs are growing. Especially if you wish to 
> continue to receive printed publications. At some point, many of us may 
> be forced to "choose" which club we want to belong to. For such a small 
> niche hobby, should that really be necessary?
> 
> The hobby, like the band itself, may be destined to fade away into 
> history--but I want to fight that battle as long as possible. What did 
> Lincoln say, "A house divided cannot stand"? I think it's past time to 
> put whatever the issues were behind us. Even now, I can't help but 
> notice that no one has been willing or able to even articulate what 
> these differences are.
> 
> Here in the South there is a popular bumper sticker displaying the 
> Confederate Flag with a circle/slash drawn over it. The text reads, "We 
> lost. Ya'll get over it".
> 
> It's a simple statement against those who would continue to fight the 
> long-forgotten Civil War, or embrace the symbols that for many also 
> represent pain and oppression. Being proud of your history is one thing. 
> Allowing it to define your future is not.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 73,
> 
> 
> Les Rayburn, N1LF
> Maylene, AL
> EM63
> 
> Member NRC, IRCA, & Medium Wave DX Circle
> Former CPC Chairman for NRC/IRCA
> 
> Perseus SDR, SDR-IQ,Funcube Pro, Wellbrooke ALA-1530+ loop, LF 
> Engineering Active Whips,
> Quantum Phaser, Kiwa Loop, Palstar MW Pre-Selector
> 
 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx