Re: [IRCA] TP 21 Jul; Victoria version

[Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>]

Day 2 in Masset.  Experimented with TOH overnight recording on 738.
 Disappointing with little to hear.  Live from 12:15 yielded a very modest
DU dawn enhancement, including the X-band.  Japanese 1st tier were so so,
not as good as yesterday, when the JJ were in quite strong.  I'm using 2
Bogs, one at 240 deg and the other 275, both DU preferred .  Also my ALA
100.  For whatever reason the 240 Bog never does well and is noisy, so I'll
deconstruct it today.  I'm planning on trying a DKAZ too, plus the FSLIC,
especially on Rosé Spit.
    Another observation today was 900 Hawaii.  Strong this morning.

     Shortwave was great this morning, too.  Much better than yesterday.

Hope all going well in OR and WA dxexpeditions.

73, Walt

On Sunday, July 21, 2013, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:

> Well, if there were Asians this morning here, it was before the SDR kicked
> in at 1130UT   And in fact, my signal strength recorder says there were
> good signals on channels like 774 1053 1287 and 1566 around 1120UT, so will
> have to start the SDR earlier.  Otherwise, except for Tahiti, things were
> pretty lackadaisical.
>
>
> Reasonable audio  at  times during the period (much of it understandable
> by a native speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):
>
> 738 Tahiti popped up a number of times, e.g. man in FF at 1134UT; this was
> consistently the best signal this morning until well past 1200UT, though
> not with this level of audio.
>
>
>
> not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or noise
> could be understood by a native speaker:
>
> 738 passing through
>
>
>
> Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language might be guessed at
> by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in talk or music) :
>
> 819 faint mx 1148UT
> 1503 man talking, then woman, 1223UT, too weak for a guess at language
> 1548 man talking, DU EE inflection 1216UT
>
>
>
>
> Strongish het, no or "near imaginary"audio (either undermodulated or
> ravaged by splatter):
>
> 891 972 1053 1116  1566 (though later, so likely DU) 1602
>
>
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
> ______________________________**_________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/**mailman/listinfo/irca<http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca>
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx