Re: [IRCA] Tom Ray Leaving WOR

[Todd <todftscytj7707@xxxxxxx>]

ND the most likely 

Todd Skaine 
Woodbury, MN
2010, PL 310 or 
Toyota radio

Chernos Saul <sauldx@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
>Can we have the best of both worlds - keep Tom Ray and lose WOR? I had a sports station underneath to the west in the wee hours, very briefly, and the likely options would be WA CA or ND.
>Saul / Burnt River ON
>
>> From: karlzuk@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 06:35:41 -0500
>> Subject: Re: [IRCA] Tom Ray Leaving WOR
>> 
>> 
>> It's unlikely that WOR 710 will drop HD Radio any time soon.
>>  
>> Clear Channel is a big player in the (God forsaken) HD Digital Radio Alliance.
>> They are the cheerleaders for iBiquity and company.
>>  
>> Without HD Radio, how could station owners break the rules to get HD-2s and HD-3s
>> on to the legitimate analog FM radio channels?
>>  
>> All of this gives me a headache!
>> You should hear my very local WCBS 880 at night at my QTH.
>> I'm only about 40 miles from the transmitter and I hear the digital machine noise
>> under the program audio constantly. A joy to listen to. 
>> 'Compatible digital'   Sure.
>>  
>> Take out the digital noisemakers and the NRSC filters.
>> Let my AM radio go!
>>  
>> Karl Zuk  N2KZ
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> 
>>  
>> 
>> > From: ricklew@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2013 07:58:59 -0800
>> > Subject: [IRCA] Tom Ray Leaving WOR
>> > 
>> > All Access reports that Tom Ray is leaving WOR, where he's been chief 
>> > engineer for more than 15 years.
>> > He'll be running a consulting business.
>> > I suppose the writing was on the wall after Clear Channel purchased the 
>> > station.
>> > He was certainly a staunch IBOC defender in its early days, although he's 
>> > seemed less optimistic about its viability in recent years.
>> > --
>> > Rick 
>> > 
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > IRCA mailing list
>> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> > 
>> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> > 
>> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> > 
>> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > 
>>  		 	   		  
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> 
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> 
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> 
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 
> 		 	   		  
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx