Re: [IRCA] TP Sept 16, 2012 / Victoria version

[d1028gary@xxxxxxx]

Hi Derek,

<<<   Hey Gary.... Is this the CC station with the poor sounding audio?   >>>

Well. its audio sounds about the same as the other Chinese stations on my $50 Tecsun PL-380 Ultralight. The problem with this basic receiver is that using the 1 kHz DSP setting (which is almost always necessary to limit domestic splatter) makes the audio sound much less impressive than that of a Perseus-SDR receiver. Because of the rudimentary filtering, high fidelity audio just isn't possible in such a situation.

73,. Gary 





-----Original Message-----
From: Derek Vincent <eargazimm@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sun, Sep 16, 2012 2:46 pm
Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP Sept 16, 2012  / Victoria version


Hey Gary.... Is this the CC station with the poor sounding audio?

Thanks

DerekVmedia@xxxxxxx

ChannelDerek.carbonmade.com

On Sep 16, 2012, at 2:03 PM, d1028gary@xxxxxxx wrote:

> 
> Hi Nick and Chuck,
> 
> Thanks to both of you for sorting out this 603 Chinese mystery station's 
identity!
> 
> 603-Huilun Buir seems to have every intention of taking over as the new "Top 
Dog" on the frequency-- at least in this China-favoring location.
> 
> 73, Gary  
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America 
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Sun, Sep 16, 2012 1:26 pm
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] TP Sept 16, 2012  / Victoria version
> 
> 
> Thanks muchly Chuck.  That really made my day.
> 
>  Huilun Buir is a bit of a shocker, especially for so early in the 
> season, its location being pretty far inland.   At peak, it was one 
> of the more readable signals on the band this morning as 
> well.   Others should be hearing it.
> 
> 
> best wishes,
> 
> Nick
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> At 19:58 16-09-12, you wrote:
>> Nick:
>> 
>> That's definitely a Hulun Buir ID at the very start of the recording.
>> 
>> Chuck
>> 
>> On 9/16/2012 12:39 PM, Nick Hall-Patch wrote:
>>> After my griping about reception or lack of it on 603 yesterday, 
>>> Gary's mystery station showed up in spades this morning fading up 
>>> at 1322 over suspected HLSA (which was ID'd by parallel with 558 
>>> somewhat later) w/woman in CC to pretty much complete readability 
>>> by 1324, fading down to return by 1328  .  603 is practically an 
>>> ideal frequency here with no real interference from 600 by sunrise, 
>>> no local electrical noise (I could hear light static crashes), so 
>>> one can really listen to the dynamics of the channel.  By 1330 I 
>>> could hear a jammer on the channel as well, might have actually 
>>> started at 1330.
>>> 
>>> Checked 3900 for the PAL/WRTH suggested parallel with no luck, but 
>>> in listening to my recording, I noticed there was a "guangbo 
>>> dientai" in there at 1327UT, but my ability to follow the cadence 
>>> of CC is pretty limited, so I'll place it here: 
>>> http://www3.telus.net/public/shallpat/listen/guangbo_dientai%20603 
>>> for anyone else to take a crack at it.  I have an SDR recording of 
>>> it, but this is just a quick and dirty version recorded using AM 
>>> and including the 3kHz het from 600.  I'm sure I can winkle out 
>>> better with more effort.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> best wishes,
>>> 
>>> Nick
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>> 
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
>> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>> 
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>> 
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx