Re: [IRCA] El Cajon, CA ULR TP 2011-03-16 - audio on 1566, help w/ID?
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] El Cajon, CA ULR TP 2011-03-16 - audio on 1566, help w/ID?



Hi Stephen,
the language sounds Japanese, so most probably FEBC Korea. Would have switched to Chinese at 1345.

73, Mauno

17.3.2011 13:37, Stephen Airy kirjoitti:
Hi all,


For the first time in probably a long time, I checked several frequencies for TPs yesterday morning for about an hour (sunrise was about 45 min into the session).
One of the frequencies I checked was 1566 kHz, and while the signal was often quickly fading up and down, I definitely heard audio on that frequency.  There is a recording, as well as a few pictures of my PL-606 showing signal readings (and a small piece of the Select-A-Tenna may be visible) at the link below.

http://cid-6bdd1917662288cb.office.live.com/browse.aspx/AM%20radio%20files/2011-03/TP%20-%202011-03-16

Would it be possible for someone to identify that station upon hearing it?  It's a 2.5 minute recording at about 1342 UTC.
There is some noise in the recording, though, besides what I would expect from natural atmospheric noise, and I'm not sure if it's powerline noise (they're probably less than 90 feet or so from where I was), or IBOC hash from 1580 KMIK Tempe, AZ, which runs 50kW DA-N, the night pattern's main lobe being pointed almost right at me.  KMIK was fairly well audible at the time, but mixing with 50kW co-channel KBLA Santa Monica, and was not nearly as strong as it usually gets in the evenings.  (I've seen it hit 70/25 barefoot sitting on top of my piano, 80/25 with the SAT, and 91/25 when adding the utility pole ground wire, making it the strongest station that's usually only received at night here - only a few locals are stronger.)


Also, I tried for 1575kHz, but couldn't get enough audio for a recording to post.  I did hear the soft-mute on the PL-606 temporarily disengage for a fraction of a second several times, but never was able to hear enough to be sure that I was, in fact, hearing a possible TP.


Frequencies I heard hets (but not enough audio to tell if something actually was there) on include:
657 kHz - sounded like it may have been slightly off frequency
747 kHz - checked this one twice, once before sunrise when KCBS was coming in on 740, and 760-KFMB was on their 50kW night DA pattern, and once again after sunrise, when 740 had KBRT (their IBOC was making it very difficult) and 760 KFMB was down to 5kW ND for the day.
774 kHz - also checked twice, before sunset and again after sunset.  Unforutunately, I was getting domestic splatter from adjacents both times.  Of note was the second session - 770-KKOB was pretty much gone by this time (although I suspect I may have faintly been able to hear them if I tuned the SAT and pointed it the right direction), so it would have either been coming from local 760-KFMB (7.3 mi NW) or 780-KKOH, which was audible at the time.  Last October when I got a good signal on 774-JOUB, none of the domestics were much of a pest (and with the help of the SAT I was able to keep the blocking/desense from 760-KFMB, on 5kW day pattern, to a manageable level).


I was not able to detect anything on 828 kHz (830-KLAA, which has a fair signal all day on the barefoot PL-606, was too much of a pest), and I don't remember if I tried 693 kHz (local 690 XEWW probably would have made that difficult) or 567 kHz (570-KLAC, audible with a fair signal in the daytime, would have made it difficult).
I did not try for 594-JOAK this morning, either.  However, I did log them last November (Thanks again, Gary DeBock, for confirming it on the yahoo group), even though I have a local 5kW IBOC station on 600 kHz, KOGO, just 7.7 miles west of me. :)


About those hets...  turns out my dad has a grid dip meter with an oscillator function on it that can generate low power RF from about 400 kHz to 250 MHz.  He got it used at least 40 years ago, it uses a vaccum tube, and is analog tuned, so isn't exactly stable, but I was able to use it to aid my chase.  Basically, first I'd tune it to the desired frequency, using the PL-606's SNR display to know when I was there, then move it farther away (if it's close enough I can get 98/25 readings, and have actually briefly seen 99/25 and 06/00 (normal dBu display range is 15-98) once each upon newly tuning a frequency before refreshing a second later and showing a more "normal" reading) and tune the SAT,  then move it even farther away to further reduce the signal, and detune the gdm to look for a het.  If there was a het, I would turn the gdm's oscillator off and check that frequency for a TP, occasionally briefly tuning the PL-606 to domestic signals to aid
  in positioning the SAT to reduce their strength.  If there was not a het, I would move on to a different frequency.


As for generating a weak signal on/near target frequencies to aid in finding TPs, does anyone know of an inexpensive (the lower the better even if I have to buy used - prefer that it be considerably cheaper than the PL-606), portable (battery-powered&  small but doesn't have to be pocket size) device I could use that would be better suited for uses like that (coverage from at least 150kHz to 1.8 MHz, up to 22 MHz is a bonus, also strong enough to hit a solid 98/25 on the PL-606's RSSI/SNR display when within about a foot of it, and an RF gain control for when I need less power)?  Ability to plug in an audio source and transmit that over short range (maybe a hundred feet - for other testing purposes) would be a nice bonus, or even modulating the carrier with a tone whose frequency could be set by the user (when chasing TPs, though, it would only transmit an unmodulated carrier).

(There's a few other things I wanted to ask about, but this post is getting longer than I would like (even though it only takes a small portion of the screen when running full screen at 1920x1440 and browser zoom at about 70%), so I'll save those for another post sometime.)

73,
Stephen
El Cajon, CA - Grid DM12MS, SE quadrant ; within 1 mi of 32°45'40"N 116°56'50"W




_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx