Re: [IRCA] [AMDX] 20 second tone on 1480 and R&R music under 1510 WLAC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] [AMDX] 20 second tone on 1480 and R&R music under 1510 WLAC



I will not be able to listen to the MP3 until later but Curtis Sadowski
sent a link to archive.org with some recordings of WLRB that he made
from Paxton, IL.  I will compare to see if the ID style matched what I
recall hearing.

Here is what his reply says:
-----------
Dave,

It's WLRB.  Here's what I just posted at the Archive:
http://www.archive.org/details/DxRadioRecording1510Khz.December9th2010&r
eCache=1

								Curtis
Sadowski
-----------
73,
Dave in Indy

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:25:54 -0500
From: "HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS" <DAVID.HASCALL@xxxxxxxx>
To: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: amdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, am@xxxxxxxxxxx, amdxer@xxxxxxxx,	Rick Dau
	<drummer1965usa@xxxxxxxxx>, irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,	John
Rieger
	<DX-midAMerica@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IRCA] 20 second tone on 1480 and R&R music under 1510
	WLAC
Message-ID:
	
<6ACA8350315331429DD2E433A39D2FB409728E98@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

My goodness, when it rains it pours!

The songs that I heard on 11/23 from 11-11:20 PM CST are:

"Let Your Love Flow" by the Bellamy Brothers, 
"Then You Can Tell Me Goodbye" by the Casino's and (later)
"Bridge Over Troubled Water" later by Simon and Garfunkel."

Dave in Indy

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul B. Walker, Jr. [mailto:walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 2:18 PM
To: HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS
Cc: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; amdxer@xxxxxxxx; am@xxxxxxxxxxx;
amdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; John Rieger; Rick Dau
Subject: Re: 20 second tone on 1480 and R&R music under 1510 WLAC

You can reasonably suspect this is WLRB unless I say otherwise.  The
Engineer agrees the songs played would match WLRB. 
 
Do not, however, count this as definate, until I confirm otherwise.
 
They are having some more pressing issues today over there, so my buddy
whos the Chief Engineer hasn't had time to attend to my questions..
they're having a computer problem with one of their FMs and one of their
on air staffers had a stroke today. (The on air staffer that had a
stroke was the one my buddy was going to ask about WLRB, as the station
is his responsibility as well as his other duties.)

Paul 


On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:36 AM, HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS
<DAVID.HASCALL@xxxxxxxx> wrote:


	Tom - I am 99.99% sure that I have been hearing WLRB Macomb, IL
on late
	for the past 3 weeks.  It has been widely noted that their talk
format
	ends at 7 PM and they revert to their previous format, whether
sunset is
	before or after that.  They keep the old format going to keep
the
	automation functioning, 24/7.  AND if the station does not
properly sign
	off at sundown, the old format would of course be sent over the
air
	without ads, newscast and such.
	
	I am reasonably sure that I heard a female singing the calls
(WLRB) at
	:27 and :57 and a male announcing them at other times ("AM 15-10
WLRB").
	
	
	As far as the "standards" format goes - many standards format
outlets
	have taken ten (twenty?) years off their playlists.  Instead of
playing
	music from the 40's and 50's, they are playing light pop /
oldies from
	the 1960's and 70's.  When I first started hearing what I
presume to be
	WLRB, I originally thought that it was rock too but the more I
paid
	attention, the more I noted that the music is more old, light
pop, which
	fits today's standards format.
	
	Paul have you heard anything from WLRB's PD?  Once again the key
	question is if WLRB's automation for the music format  inserts
singing
	calls at appx 27 and 57 past the hour.
	
	Rick Dau (NE) heard WLRB behaving this way in September.
	
	Ben Root from KMSD assured me that it is not them.
	
	73,
	Dave in Indy
	
	------------------------------
	
	Message: 7
	Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 05:08:59 -0600
	From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
	To: am@xxxxxxxxxxx
	Cc: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
	Subject: Re: [IRCA] 20 second tone on 1480 and R&R music under
1510
	       WLAC
	Message-ID:
	
<AANLkTi=_tOyOrYn_ZtiWq2cv9O80CoREtDXzLtvfNaPU@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
	Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
	

	Wow, I wonder what 1510 you heard? I *think* . .but don't know
for sure
	that
	WLRB 1510 Macomb, IL tends to be standards/nostalgia.. not rock
n roll.
	
	Could this be WJOT Wabash, IN on late?
	
	Could your 1480 be WDJO Cincinatti, OH or WLMV Madison, WI?
Either of
	those
	would fit your loop bearing.
	
	Paul Walker
	www.onairdj.com <http://www.onairdj.com/> 
	www.facebook.com/onairdj
	
	
	On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Tom Jasinski <amdxer@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
	
	> At 02:04 CST somebody on 1480 Khz is running a continuous loop
with a
	20
	> second steady tone.  This is repeated about every 43 seconds.
	>
	> Loop bearing approx SE/NW from here.   Anyone have any ideas
on who
	this
	> may
	> be.  Signal is weak and fady so it is not close.
	>
	> on 1510khz a station playing R&R music selections was in
poo/fair for
	a few
	> minutes from 01:55 to 02:05am CST in WLAC null.  This unid
went
	through TOH
	> without any ID or spots.
	>
	>
	> Tom  Jasinski
	> Joliet, IL
	>
	>
	
	
	





------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:04:39 -0500
From: Russ Johnson <radiok3pi@xxxxxxxxx>
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
	<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [IRCA] SANGEAN DT-400W
Message-ID:
	<AANLkTinECGE0qad2zyg1uQOFhmcKsvAgODjm3=YwPjf3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I like that strategy....."I don't know how it got into my cart?"     : )

I have the earlier version of the radio DT-200V.  It is a great little
radio.  It is the only one I have where I can sometimes totally null out
my
local pest.  It's my favorite hand-held/ultralight.

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:20 PM, HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS <
DAVID.HASCALL@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> http://www.dxer.ca/the-forum?func=view&catid=29&id=2372
>
> My take away from the dxer.ca review is that it is sensitive but not
too
> selective.
>
> Still, if it is from your lady, I would keep it (as Curtis S.
> mentioned).
>
> 73,
>
> Dave in Indy
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 2010 21:39:39 -0500
> From: Ira Elbert New III <ien3@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <radiobroadcasting@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <abdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>        <dxlogs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> <amfmdx@xxxxxxxxx>,
>        <ircamember@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <am@xxxxxxxxx>,
> <dxhub@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>        <am@xxxxxxxxxxx>, <amdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [Amdx] SANGEAN DT-400W
> Message-ID: <COL104-W633376A497686674783A3D9E2E0@xxxxxxx>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
>     So-o-o-o... it's my Birthday today and (Oh...don't worry about
> passing along any Birthday greetings) I open up the present from my
> Wife, and it turns out to be a SANGEAN DT-400W that she got from the
> folks over at AMAZON.COM <http://amazon.com/>. She said it was in her
> cart, but she didn't
> put it there. Neither did I. I don't know a lot about this radio, but
> she said she could easily send it back if I don't want it. I haven't
> opened it up yet and I wanted some input before I do. Is it worth
> keeping? I know that's open for debate, but I thought I would just
throw
> the question out there just like that. Should I have her send it back
> for something similar? I already have a G8. Do I need something from
> TECSUN or the like? I have no idea what she paid for it, so if there
are
> any suggestions to be had, please keep it in a similar price range.
>     Thanks for all of your help. I will now go back to enjoying what's
> left of my 46th Birthday. Perhaps I'll take in Top Chef a little later
> on BRAVO...
>
> Bert New
> Watkinsville, Georgia
> Proudly Serving You Since 1964!
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>


-- 

*
The beginning of wisdom is to recognize the world as it is, not as
what we wish it to be.
*


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 13:13:38 -0800 (PST)
From: bill kral <jwkral@xxxxxxxx>
To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [IRCA] 1210, 1330,	1500 Khz at 0100 PST------------540 at
12
	noon PST
Message-ID: <458010.16324.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1

Early Wed AM at 0100 PST Tuning into good DX and found station playing
oldies on 1210 with good signal peaks over others so checked log and
found CFYM Kindersley Sk.Liked the music?and listened for a few minutes
but no ID?and?into another song so I scanned up and found the same music
on 1330 but slightly out of sync by a lag of a few seconds.Look ed at
log again and found CJYM Rosetown Sk. 1210 peaked out stronger with 250
watts than 1330 did with 10KW.?Both stations were simulcasting but ID
was independent while log quotes a commom ID for both. Last night at
same time only 1330 was audible. 1210 was a mix with SS from Seattle on
top?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????
??????? Early Wed.After 0100 on 1500 an ESPN Program was out with a
better than normal signal as 1500 is usually graveyard sounding.Could
not locate such a format in the log so
 maybe a recent switch from something else to sports.Last night and
early this morning no sign of this one and 1500 was level again with
distant mix.??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? Also
I'm still catching an all day listenable signal from CBC Radio One on
540 in SK.



------------------------------

Message: 5
Date: Thu,  9 Dec 2010 21:15:03 GMT
From: ng1u@xxxxxxxxxx (Ng1u)
To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [IRCA] WWV Solar Report
Message-ID: <1012091615051213@xxxxxxxxxx>

:Product: Geophysical Alert Message wwv.txt
:Issued: 2010 Dec 09 2105 UTC
# Prepared by the US Dept. of Commerce, NOAA, Space Weather Prediction
Center
#
#          Geophysical Alert Message
#
Solar-terrestrial indices for 09 December follow.
Solar flux 87 and estimated mid-latitude A-Index 3.
The mid-latitude K-index at 2100 UTC on 09 December was 1 (5 nT).
No space weather storms were observed for the past 24 hours.
No space weather storms are expected for the next 24 hours.

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Trends
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Date 08   08   08   08   08   08   09   09   09   09   09   09   09   09

UTC  0600 0900 1200 1500 1800 2100 0000 0300 0600 0900 1200 1500 1800
2100 
SFlx 87   87   87   87   87   87   87   87   87   87   87   87   87   87

A-in 3    3    3    3    3    4    5    5    5    5    5    5    5    3

K-in 2    1    1    1    2    2    2    1    1    2    0    0    1    1



------------------------------

Message: 6
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 16:38:38 -0500
From: "HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS" <DAVID.HASCALL@xxxxxxxx>
To: <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <amdx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [IRCA] Anyone try a Kchibo KK-68 "shirtpocket" radio?
Message-ID:
	
<6ACA8350315331429DD2E433A39D2FB409729057@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain;	charset="us-ascii"

While browsing eBay.  $8.99 **shipped!** from Hong Kong.

eBay item number 370372443926.

73,
Dave in Indy




------------------------------

Message: 7
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:00:18 -0800 (PST)
From: bill kral <jwkral@xxxxxxxx>
To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [IRCA] NFLD ultralight bandscan
Message-ID: <955348.39157.qm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

In the list of stations in this ultralight scan from Signal Hill I
noticed that on 747 and 1008 the Canary Islands were on top while on 675
Holland was audible. Since Holland also occupies 747 and 1008 they are
not or rarely hopping over the pond.The Dutch 747 and 1008 run on more
power than 675 so if Canary did not occupy those slots then Holland
would probably be there all the time.The question is --why did two
Canary stations choose to operate on the same frequencies as two Dutch
Stations. I would bet that the two Dutch guys were on the air before the
two Canary ones. Bill in BC



------------------------------

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



End of IRCA Digest, Vol 80, Issue 32
************************************

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx