Re: [IRCA] TP for 7 Oct from Victoria, BC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] TP for 7 Oct from Victoria, BC



Hi Nick,
 
Thanks again for your TP report from Victoria, and it's always interesting  
to compare propagation to different areas.
 
<<  936 hardly at the booming level described by Gary  >>
 
936-Anhui was only at a fair-good level here this morning, but the signal  
level was good enough to record part of the English study program on the  
station. The English speech that you noticed on 936 yesterday morning was 
being  analyzed by a female teacher speaking in Chinese, with the English speech 
played  again for reference.
 
_http://www.mediafire.com/?agrpjdzjcr3f7f6_ 
(http://www.mediafire.com/?agrpjdzjcr3f7f6) 
 
It's also interesting that Walt apparently had NHK on 639 kHz this  
morning, where here it was all CNR1, with no trace of anything else. The  
Chinese-favored low band propagation here was also noticed by John B. last  year, but 
last season I was mostly chasing new stations with the 9' loop, and  not 
attempting to check the entire band each morning.
 
73, Gary 
 
 
 
 
In a message dated 10/7/2010 11:00:50 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,  
nhp@xxxxxxxx writes:

Just a  few minutes listening after 1400UT here this morning, and generally 
conditions  seemed poorer than yesterday.   However, signal strengths were 
so  variable that I might have heard more if I'd listened longer.

pretty  darn good audio (all of it understandable by a native speaker, at  
least
briefly):

747 JOIB
774 JOUB

reasonable audio   at  times during the period (much of it understandable 
by a
native  speaker, though often battling w/splash or noise):


828 JOBB  


not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or  noise 
could be
understood by a native speaker

1287 JOHR
1566  HLAZ



Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language  might be guessed at 
by
cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes  in talk or music) :

864 channel was quiet enough to hear mostly a  gentle ~1Hz SAH even with 
the BFO off, but audio was very faint
936 hardly  at the booming level described by Gary
1143 Taiwan?  also mostly a SAH  rather than audio



Strongish het, no audio (either  undermodulated or ravaged by splatter):

1323
1377


best  wishes,

Nick

*****************************
Nick  Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada   

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing  list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, 
its  editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information:  http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message:  irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx