[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] 1120 Yelm Wa
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] 1120 Yelm Wa
- From: Scott Fybush <scott@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:26:11 -0500
bill kral wrote:
To all of you who commented on the 1120 Yelm story. How did they come
up with 1120 as a viable freq if all of you agree on the fact that
they will be swallowed up by a 50 grander only ,(I don't know,I
haven't checked a map yet) less than 200 kliks away.I have been
getting KPNW with a fair signal here in Vic BC at 3:30 PM everyday
for 6 months so after dark it will be useless. 1140 looks a lot
better as it is vacant in OR and WA with the nearest occupant in
Boise . I don't know if 6K would cause problems for the 1150s in
Pullman and Seattle. Anyone with a yea or a nay.Bill in BC
1140 would certainly have been better at night - but it would have been
too close to 1150 in Seattle for daytime use. For adjacent-channel class
B stations, the 0.25 mV/m of the proposed station can't overlap the 0.5
mV/m contour of the existing station, and the 0.5 of the proposed
station can't overlap the 0.25 mV/m contour of the existing station. The
0.25 mV/m contour of the Seattle 1150 covers all of Yelm.
1120 may be a lousy frequency, but it was all that was available.
s
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx