Re: [IRCA] KBXZ-1650 Flagstaff

["HASCALL, DAVID CIV DFAS" <DAVID.HASCALL@xxxxxxxx>]

Well Patrick, not *exactly* the same letter sent to the 1620 in Stayton
- that one contained lots of detail about what would possibly make the
station illegal.  The Portland agent (or operative, if you prefer :) )
mentioned that his vertical whip was complaint but noted that the
transmitter was grounded to a 40' tower and so on.  The details in the
Flagstaff report didn't mention what he saw, at all (except for the
reading).  FWIW - the Portalnd Agent seemed quite thorough and that is a
good thing.

Dave in Indy

------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 09:30:52 -0800
From: mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx (Patrick Martin)
To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Mailing list for the International Radio
	Club of	America)
Subject: Re: [IRCA] KBXZ-1650 Flagstaff
Message-ID: <1808-4B1552CC-2832@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII

Apparently the same letter to Stayton station. I do know while at an NAB
convention several years back, there was a guy asking at the sessions if
there were any pirate stations operating. He was making a list of them
to turn into the FCC. So even if the pirate is not causing interference,
there are those that do not want it operating.

Patrick



------------------------------


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx