Re: [IRCA] Puyallup, WA TP's for 11-23... Another Late Peak; in Victoria BC t...

[D1028Gary@xxxxxxx]

Hi Nick,
 
Thanks for your daily TP reports, with amazing detail that  is very useful 
here.
 
The salt water-enhanced Victoria TP openings (as well as the Orcas Island  
version) are always much more impressive than the watered-down Puyallup  
variety, so it's quite likely that Victoria had good TP propagation well  
before 1510 UTC this morning. It's been very obvious since the summer (when Walt  
was reporting on his DU's in August) that Victoria has much longer and 
deeper TP  openings than this Puyallup inland location-- something that I'm sure 
Guy  Atkins would agree with.
 
The short but intense TP openings here always cause a wild scramble to  
search for new loggings, making it tough to do a complete band scan (like your  
excellent daily TP reports, in great detail). Most of the time I'm  lucky 
to find two or three interesting TP's before the band folds.
 
73, Gary
 
  
 
 
In a message dated 11/23/2009 10:02:40 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
nhp@xxxxxxxx writes:

At 16:47  11/23/2009, you wrote:
>Hello All,
> 
>This morning's TP  signals behaved very much like yesterday's weird  
>session--  mediocre levels until about 1510....

So....I made a good decision not  starting listening until 1520UT, but 
should have started a little earlier just  the same?

>pretty darn good audio (all of it understandable by a  native speaker, at 
least briefly): 


594 JOAK, not until 1531  though
747 JOIB; this seemed the best NHK2 this AM
774 JOUB 
972 HLCA  


reasonable audio  at  times during the period (much of  it understandable 
by a native speaker,
though often battling w/splash or  noise):

603 HLCA w/KK talk, no 558 // this morning
828  JOBB

not so reasonable audio, occasional words or phrases in splash or  noise 
could be understood by a native speaker

279 R. Rossii
639  CNR-1 //5030
945 CNR-1 //5030
1134 x2, one //972, other likely  JOQR?




Burbles in the splatter and noise (if lucky, language  might be guessed at 
by cadence of talk, or parallel established by changes in  talk or music) :

567 JOIK //594
756 seemed like KK talk by  inflection?
837 woman talking, didn't seem //594, so Harbin?
1242 at  1530, likely JOLF?
1422 JJ inflected talk likely JORF
1503 JOUK //594 at  1536


Strongish het, no audio (either undermodulated or ravaged by  splatter):

1566; ironically, this showed  near imaginary audio at  1738UT after the 
change to the Russian service pattern, but there wasn't much  band noise by 
then either.  Certainly a respectable carrier which was cut  at 1800UT.


best  wishes,

Nick







*****************************
Nick  Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada  

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing  list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions  expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
original  contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, 
its  editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information:  http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message:  irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx