Re: [IRCA] Beverage - Wellbrook Array Comparisons

[Chuck Hutton <charlesh3@xxxxxxx>]

John - 

 

I was just reporting on the comparison between Nick's unit and the Beverage we used. As we didn't have anything else to compare against the Beverage, I couldn't very well say anything else.

 

I'll leave the summaries of all the models and the progress reports to you. After all, you're in contact with that side of things.

 

As I drew no conclusions about the other antennas (nor mentioned them), I'd like to have my comment taken for what it is: a simple comparison of Nick's antenna and the Beverage.

 

 

Chuck

 

 

> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2009 19:46:15 -0800
> To: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> From: bjohnorcas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [IRCA] Beverage - Wellbrook Array Comparisons
> 
> 
> John Bryant's response 9:00PM 11/9
> 
<CLIP>

 

> What Chuck seems to ignore is that the Wellbrook family of Phased 
> Arrays has gone rather far beyond the unit that Nick A/Bed with 
> Chuck's Beverage: there are currently two new Arrays, both of which 
> have been A/Bed at Grayland and each of which represents a very 
> noticeable improvement over Nick's ALA-100 Array in the ability to 
> hear very weak DX signals from an ocean-side location. The results of 
> all of those A/B tests have been reported here; why does Chuck ignore them???
> 
> 
> John Bryant
> Orcas Island, WA, USA
> Winradio G313e and various Ultralights
> Wellbrook Phased Array + Superloops
> 
> _______________________________________________

 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx