Re: [IRCA] TP for 6 Nov from Victoria, BC
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] TP for 6 Nov from Victoria, BC



Short of finding someone who speaks Mandarin, someone could check the listed SW //'s next time it's in, or listen for the interval signal or an ID....

D1028Gary@xxxxxxx wrote:
Hi Bruce, Nick and Nigel,
The programming on the 648 kHz station from 1430-1500 this morning sure sounded a lot like the VOR of last year. The Chinese announcers had somewhat elderly voices, and at 1458 there was apparent Russian music. I didn't check any parallels, like Nick did. Of course, the signal took a deep dive at the top of the hour (1500). 73, Gary In a message dated 11/6/2009 3:25:27 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, bportzer@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:

Nick  Hall-Patch wrote:
At 21:43 11/6/2009, you  wrote:

The following schedule for Voice of Russia Chinese service appeared in
DX Listeners Digest  recently:
1800-1900  12000  7330   7300  5930  1251  648   585
 1900-2000  12000  7330  7300  5930  1251   648   585
2000-2100  13590  12000 7300   5930  1251  1080  801  648  585
 2100-2200  12000  7300  6045  1251  648    585

The times are apparently those of China, so they would be 1000-1400 UT. This is the B09 schedule, which took effect in late October, just in
time to not be included in the current PAL
Only problem is that  both Gary and I heard 648 after 1400UT, Bruce....


 Nick
Hmmm... interesting. I found the schedule posted on the Voice of Russia website - http://chinese.ruvr.ru/main.php?lng=pek&w=56&p= It's in Chinese, of course, but the Google translation tool says the times are 1800-2200 Beijing time and took effect October 25. Maybe someone at VoR goofed when they converted from Moscow time to Beijing time? Maybe someone other than VoR?
Bruce


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx