Re: [IRCA] TP DX for 21Aug09 More typical
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] TP DX for 21Aug09 More typical



Sorry to report, I was up late and slept right through max dawn. Darn it!

Walter, from what you said, if the JJs were coming in best on your most southerly wire, I may no have heard much, anyway (great rationalization!)

John B.



At 06:44 AM 8/21/2009 -0700, you wrote:
Back to more normal conditions between 12:57 and 13:18. A mixture of DU and TP reception, predominantly at the bottom half of the band, although I was hearing audio on the usual channels...1575 VOA, 1566 HLAZ (both 8 level), 1503, 1386 (6 level), 1287 JJ at 7, 1242 (JJ at 8 level), 1179, 1098, 1089, 1008, 963, 954 819 (all these 6 level, exc OC on 1098), 774 best of the NHK2 at 7, 765 (DU), 738...really nice signal that stayed around to 13:30 at 8 level, 702 (DU), 639 (Fiji at 6 level), 621 (6), 612 (Brisbane at 7), 603, 594, 585 (all 6), 576 and 567 both 7 and DU, 531 (a 6). The lowest frequencies were all quite strong on the Perseus waterfall, and monitored well after 13:00, so I suspect they would have been better had I started at the bottom and worked up. Also, they were all heard best with the S facing large diameter corner fed loop with 10 dB attenuation. Off to work I must go! ....Walt Salmaniw, Victoria, BC

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx