Re: [IRCA] JOUB 774
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] JOUB 774




--
Paul,

The link below tells about signal strenght meters
and how they work.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S_meter

KXMG has a CP,  night time one tower and 10 watts.

Dennis,
Salmon Creek, WA

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx> 

> Well, can someone explain exactly what S9+55db is to someone clueless like 
> me? I simply know thats a STRONG signal, but thats all I know. 
> 
> However, in the realm of propigation and AM radio, I like to remember 
> "anything is possible". I once heard a station on 1590khz about 300 miles 
> away and verified they were running 67 watts! 
> 
> Unless you can absolutely prove it, I wouldn't call a station out on 
> cheating... accusations like that don't help a DX'ers reputation. 
> 
> Sure, sometimes we have mentioned a station on here to be cheating.. but 
> thats when there's no mistaking it, like the station is very clearly 
> operation Non directional when it should be very drirecitonal... or it's 
> operating in the multiple thousand sof watts when it should be in the single 
> digits. 
> 
> I simply don't think we can rule out KXMG 1150 cheating, 5 mile reception, 
> simply, is not unheard of. 
> 
> Paul Walker 
> www.onairdj.com 
> 
> 
> On 12/10/08, Patrick Martin wrote: 
> > 
> > Paul, 
> > 
> > Sure, you can "hear" a station with 10 watts 5 miles or 10miles, but not 
> > at S9+55DB!!!! 47 watts at 5 miles is not going to give you S9+55DB 
> > directly from an EWE antenna to a receiver, unless you have "alot" of 
> > amplication to push that S meter up. If the station was operating with 5 
> > KW rather than 1 KW, the drop between the two would be small, but not 
> > down to 47 watts! 
> > 
> > 73, 
> > 
> > Patrick 
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________ 
> IRCA mailing list 
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx