[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] CFXL was Has anybody ever tried this?
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] CFXL was Has anybody ever tried this?
- From: "Len Hyde" <donutbandit@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2008 00:18:02 -0800
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx designates 72.14.176.152 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@xxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=kOwcxUA37OMyzVw3KB2H4ztXs/sIdURbo5S1Ow70MLA=; b=wkwarUXGr1x3q3c55Gm74P0tcJxw7dU1l2x4BHD5RwIjQJElYKjUg5QZa6mYwYTZ9Z DUBR+1nqfqoUg/Xn/KpRMFscH83NgmFU3GLATxyImN7SNE4jGKAwI4FbiFL5C7XOMBFA 9ozoY3kRdD0LtdkLSKCs+y8BRIadEm/fqBgf8=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=FD09zFE4CmLCVDG1gswFYbwsug4mrrgMqm+2lawYsP+F236NqfcIV7GTmE7lq0VofD 9vYRgtQdpjjNJs8rSny1sg2AF46z59FpdLiQ48gnRXXe78GmbX5NlU8Bva8t6meVnJVZ a+nkhJed6sSVMlQ21mEBgUoCkwoC/TdfbVq4Y=
I got the calls from here:
http://www.radio-locator.com/cgi-bin/info?call=CFXL&service=AM
Never actually heard the calls, as they ID only as "AM - 1140".
Harder DXing these days, eh? Calls never given, long blocks of talk followed
by long blocks of spots. You hope the spots give you a clue, but often they
are national in scope.
Apparently, I can't trust websites either.
On Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 11:53 PM, Patrick Martin <mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Dane,
>
> Also 1140 AB also went through a lot of call changes, I remember CKXL,
> CISS, etc. I think I have them all QSL'd too. CHRB is good here too.
>
> Patrick
>
> Patrick Martin
> KGED QSL Manager
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
--
Leonard Hyde
Weed, CA
Realistic DX-440
6 foot shielded loop
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx