Re: [IRCA] DUs July 23 from Orcas Island: Poor
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] DUs July 23 from Orcas Island: Poor



John, I just read your posting.  Yes!  I did do better, I think, and yes, I too thought it was more Aussie and less NZ than the last few days!  .......Walt.

----- Original Message -----
From: "John H. Bryant" <bjohnorcas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, July 23, 2008 9:29 am
Subject: [IRCA] DUs July 23 from Orcas Island: Poor
To: "irca-hard-core-dx.com" <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Generally, it was a poor morning, not so much from the number of 
> audios point of view, but rather from the fact that the audios 
> that 
> were there were VERY weak, almost imaginary, with the exception 
> of 
> 612 which peaked at a solid 7 at dawn.
> 
> Low 6s, unless noted:
> 
> 531
> 567
> 576
> 612 Low 6 early, 7 at dawn (1230)
> 639 First audio from Fiji in several weeks
> 738 Definite DU
> 756
> 765
> 774 Both DU and JJ, both low 6s
> 963
> 1512
> 1566 DU
> 
> Even though it was poor, this AM seemed more Aussie and less New 
> Zealand than has been the norm this season.
> 
> Hope that Walt did better on the Coast.
> 
> 
> 
> John B.
> Orcas Island, WA, USA
> Rcvrs: WiNRADiO 313e, Eton e1, Ultralights
> Antennas: Two 70' x 100' Conti Super Loops, West and Northwest
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of 
> the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the 
> opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx