[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] KDLG-670 now IBOC
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] KDLG-670 now IBOC
- From: "Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2008 00:08:31 -0400
- Authentication-results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx designates 64.15.155.228 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; dkim=neutral (body hash did not verify) header.i=@xxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; bh=eLjRXQ0mMh4gjronnX4wBh+Ww/KvpHIefr5GIlh4bLY=; b=mmY+PX855FlUZsegT3ggMiPtc/Bvdak4w2aScyeXUInurrq2hCyZDpZeWkjAt7Tig1 1UihMRc6X/vU8aWtoRemqXoDLbyZp2T5elm8KwiUPcS/FERpTyXEzQ2qrFZ5fUvyqz0i HVqGoyL/uypeRoZa1nI1jmcIBlL3kRmLYaXrM=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:references; b=u9riDmiGF2qD6ekXYN6L2NU+7fSrgaK8yRP7WAwRDlVch6Z7XIZOFcZae0d6UjOhBs M21nf8ngp+biyBKrfHooTbS/zqetaKWmiWji8gbD35hcFSCYMBvQrtM+0R68OY2JP2B4 hSrPsVjBzbiaM6erwdpFxRB6N/4aSeI8/qxu0=
KIYU was silent last year as well for another reason, the generator that
feeds pwoer to the transmitter broke down and they didn't have the parts.
On a side note, how come KIYU's own website claims they are a 12.5KW AM
station, when their FCC license only says 5KW? AM I missing something?
Paul
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 12:01 AM, Bruce Portzer <bportzer@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Scott Fybush wrote:
>
>> As I understand it, it's a question of making use of existing resources
>> and keeping the engineering as uncomplicated as possible under the difficult
>> circumstances many of these stations face. Most of the bush AMs (I believe
>> KBRW is a notable exception) operate studios and transmitters at a common
>> site. No studio-transmitter links to go down, no remote transmitter sites to
>> try to get to when something fails, no big networks of low-power repeaters
>> that have to be maintained. Just a tower that's already built and paid for,
>> right there on site. Remember, at a lot of these stations there is no
>> resident engineer - if something breaks, someone has to be flown in at great
>> expense. So there's a huge priority put on simplicity, and it's hard to get
>> much simpler than a non-directional AM that's right there next to the
>> studio.
>>
> There are a few others with separate studio and transmitter sites in the
> Alaskan bush. Both Nome stations (KNOM and KICY) I believe are that way,
> the latter in part for its DA to beam programs to Russia. KIYU Galena is
> another one - it was off the air several months last year after the STL
> tower at the studio collapsed (a dump truck backed into one of the guy wires
> or some such thing). KOTZ also has a remote tx site, per a verie from last
> year. The CE sent me a couple of jpg's of the station, and I'm now using
> the pic of the tx site as the wallpaper on my laptop.
>
> Not only must the stations deal with remoteness, lack of technical help,and
> shipping challenges, but the weather is usually downright nasty during the
> winter. KAGV-1110, as I recall, was flooded about a month after it first
> hit the air, and had to remain silent until the owner (a missionary group)
> had the time and money to make the needed repairs.
>
> Bruce
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
--
Sincerely,
Paul B. Walker, Jr.
http://www.realradiousa.com
http://www.radio-talk.net
http://www.myspace.com/walkerbroadcasting
walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx