Re: [IRCA] CBA-less 1070
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] CBA-less 1070



On Tuesday 08 April 2008 09:00, kj8o@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > Here in N.E. MN CHOK's signal is consistantly hearable under WTSO
> > [whose signal is aimed right up the street in front of my house
> > before it is dumped in Hudson Bay].  Many times CHOK is strong
> > enough to overtake WTSO. According to the "NRC Nighttime Antenna
> > Pattern Book" I am located just outside CHOK's nighttime pattern.
> > They seem to put a very good signal into this area.
>
> I should get a copy of the Niughttime antenna patterns book, as I
> find pretty amazing that I am only 45 miles southwest of Sarnia,
> and I can hardly hear them at night. Daytime, on the other hand,
> they have a very nice signal headed this way.

You can easily look up the patterns at fccinfo.com, or the FCC's AMQ 
site (http://www.fcc.gov/mb/audio/amq.html).  From your observations, 
it appears that they are doing a pattern change, but I still think 
that their night pattern is not what it should be.  I'm at 60 degrees 
azimuth from them, and should be deep within their eastern null.  
They should be in the mud here, but instead are usually the dominant 
signal, and often were even before CBA's demise.  Actually, WTIC's 
IBOC is now the dominant 1070 signal here now, but CHOK is always 
there in the hiss at night.

Barry

-- 
Barry McLarnon  VE3JF  Ottawa, ON
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx