Re: [IRCA] Short check of the AM Band
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Short check of the AM Band




--
Scott,

Thanks for explaining the FCC datebase information.  
A good reason to used other frequency listings.

Dennis,
Salmon Creek, WA

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: Scott Fybush <scott@xxxxxxxxxx> 

> vroomski@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: 
> > 
> > Deane 
> > 
> > Thanks for the correction on CKOM. That's what I get 
> > for checking in the FCC date base. 
> > 
> > I send a email to Charles Miller of the FCC to let him 
> > know that CKOM was still listed on 1250. 
> 
> The FCC doesn't care what callsigns are shown for Canadian stations in 
> its database. The only reason they (and Mexican and Caribbean stations) 
> are even in there is to provide the information that US stations need in 
> order to provide the protection to Canada that international treaties 
> require. That requires updated engineering data; the callsigns are just 
> there for convenience, and very little effort is put into keeping them 
> updated. (The source of record for Canadian calls and operating status 
> is Industry Canada's BASERAD database, which is a bear to work with.) 
> 
> Because of the way those treaties are written, Canada gets protection 
> for its AM stations even after those stations go silent - and that means 
> engineering records for those stations have to be maintained in the 
> FCC's CDBS database, complete with the last known callsigns. So CKOM 
> appears in the database on both 1250 and 650 - and will continue to do 
> so as long as the current rules remain in effect. 
> 
> s 
> _______________________________________________ 
> IRCA mailing list 
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx