Re: [IRCA] WYPC

["Paul B. Walker, Jr." <walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx>]

Moving might help them both, but it's alot harder to do then you may
think...

Paul



On Feb 4, 2008 11:05 AM, David Faulkner <dfdf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks for the info Paul.  It would seem, though, that moving them would
> benefit both WYPC and WOUB.  When WYPC went on the air WOUB was running
> 250
> watts SH (specified hours only).  Now WOUB runs 660 watts days, 1 kw at
> night, and the two stations balance signal strength at about the
> Athens/Vinton county line, where both are essentially unlistenable because
> of the interference they cause each other.
>
> 73's
> David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> On Behalf Of Paul B. Walker, Jr.
> Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2008 4:15 PM
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] WYPC
>
> A Class D, which is what WYPC is, can remain a Class D if they move to
> another frequency.
>
> however, moving from 1330 to 1280 would be considered a major change and
> can
> only be done when the FCC opens the filing window, which wont be for
> awhile.  A Minor changei s 30Khz either way.
>
> Theres some rule in there too that if it applies for more night pwoer then
> it already has, it has to meet the minimum 250.. and that could include
> building too man ytowers.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
> On Feb 3, 2008 3:51 PM, David Faulkner <dfdf@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Greetings All;
> >
> >
> >
> >            WYPC has been back on the air since last Tuesday (1/29) but
> > signal appears weaker than usual.  They still have adult standards.  I
> > can't
> > help wondering why, if they want to make this a going proposition, they
> > don't apply for the old Jackson 1280, get 1 kw days and probably 125
> watts
> > or so night, and no longer lose the eastern side of their potential
> > audience
> > to WOUB slop.
> >
> >
> >
> > 73's
> >
> > David
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Sincerely,
> Paul B. Walker, Jr.
> www.walkerbroadcasting.com
> www.myspace.com/walkerbroadcasting
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>


-- 
Sincerely,
Paul B. Walker, Jr.
www.walkerbroadcasting.com
www.myspace.com/walkerbroadcasting
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx