Re: [IRCA] NY Times - House Cmte Chmn orders FCC Inquiry

[kh2ar@xxxxxxxxxxx]

Thanks Lee - good info to know.

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: LEE FRESHWATER <amlogbook@xxxxxxxxx> 

> Do not send emails.... They will not count.(and they probably wont get read)... 
> You need to send a letter. Send it to their Washington office AS WELL as a copy 
> to their main district office. 
> 
> SEND seperate letters to each member of the committee 
> 
> I speak from experience...actually my wife worked 18 years for Cliff Stearns 
> R-FL 
> 
> 
> regards to the group and good luck...... 
> 
> lee freshwater 
> 
> 
> 
> kh2ar@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote: Well said Bob - I think I'll send Rep. Stupak an e-mail 
> today and suggest that he indeed put these two poorly conceived and executed 
> ideas under the microscope of common sense. 
> 
> Way to go. 
> 
> Jim Pogue 
> Memphis, TN 
> 
> -------------- Original message -------------- 
> From: "Bob Foxworth" 
> 
> > Today's NY Times, in an AP wire story, says that John 
> > Dingell-D-MI who heads the House Energy and 
> > Commerce Committee, says that the FCC has suffered 
> > an "apparent breakdown in an open and transparent 
> > regulatory process". He is "losing confidence that 
> > the commission has been conducting its affairs in 
> > an appropriate manner", and has ordered an inquiry. 
> > 
> > The investigation will be conducted by Rep. Bart Stupak, 
> > D-MI, who has received "several complaints about the 
> > way that (Kevin) Martin has conducted business" that 
> > include claims of an "abuse of power and an attempt 
> > to keep fellow commissioners in the dark". The terms 
> > "selectively withholding data" and "short-circuiting 
> > procedural norms" also appear in the AP story's 
> > allegations, among others. 
> > 
> > End excerpts from the AP story. The following are from 
> > me. 
> > 
> > Perhaps someone will advise Rep. Stupak of the 
> > academic interest of examining the ways in which 
> > the Commission came to its decisions on the BPL 
> > issue, and the IBOC issue, both of which seem to me 
> > to have striking similarities, among which are 
> > deliberately ignoring technical information that 
> > would suggest not adopting the positions that were 
> > subsequently taken. 
> > 
> > Should be interesting. 
> > 
> > - Bob 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > IRCA mailing list 
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> > 
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> > contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> > editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> > 
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> > 
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> > 
> _______________________________________________ 
> IRCA mailing list 
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Lee J Freshwater 
> Ocala, FL 
> IRCA EDXR /AWARDS & REPRINT SERVICE 
> www.amlogbook.com 
> www.bgs.cc 
> _______________________________________________ 
> IRCA mailing list 
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca 
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original 
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its 
> editors, publishing staff, or officers 
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org 
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx