[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] TPs for 29 Oct 2007
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] TPs for 29 Oct 2007
- From: Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 05:48:38 +0000
At 14:34 29/10/2007, you wrote:
>972 had a massive signal, but very puny modulation (as John Bryant
>has noted).
Interestingly, from this location, this one seemed to me to have had
puny modulation for at least the last two seasons. If anything,
I've heard more audio this season because its overall strength has
been better, but mileages appear to vary....it wasn't there today
when I tuned by, however.
This morning seemed to be an improvement on yesterday, though not
really too much time to check things out, a brief period before
1400UT, and another before 1430:
Asian unless noted.
Darn good audio, if briefly: 774
Reasonable audio (though often battling w/splash) 639 CC //5030, 648
briefly, likely Russia, 747, 828 (this had a hum on it at 1430UT
interfering with JOBB)
Not so reasonable audio, occasional words in splash or noise: 558,
567, 594, all Japanese; 621 Russian by the sound of it; by 1400, just
2 sets of pips, no IDs, 666 JJ, 945 Chinese.
Burbles in the splatter: 612 DU with a SAH, 711, 837, 864, 918, 936
strong carrier, no audio: 603, 702 (someone about 25Hz high here;
N. Korea?), 846, 855 hum, 1098, 1242, 1287, 1475
splatter seemed worse than usual this morning, but a number of less
usual channels were showing signs of life also. For the first time
in a number of days, the northerly Flag was showing better signals on
some of them as well.
best wishes,
Nick
****************************************************************************
Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, B.C.
Canada
****************************************************************************
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx