Re: [IRCA] A response from Clear-Channel - my reply

[Milspec390@xxxxxxx]

offending stations react like nasty adolescents caught in a trick. They 
stupidly claim noise reports lack proper form, any impertinence they can think of 
to evade the truth.

they embraced a failed, destructive 'technology' under coercion from greaszy 
slavemasters. rather than speak up early, they folded like cheap cameras.
 
now they nastily reply to noise reporters about how they have 'balls' and 
will achieve historical greatness by pimping HD. they sound like they belong in a 
booby hatch.
 
hd proves, when otherwise intellingent men, expert in their field and free 
from inner disturbance, involve themselves in schemes, they shortly behave 
strangely and spew nonsense.
 
 replies from offending stations are a study in heated denial. were the issue 
anything but this all consuming obsession of avaricious dull-kasters known as 
hd, those making such arrogant, surly, utterly inadequate replies would be 
canned on the spot.
 
on another note, they yap about trying real rad formats on streams. as legit 
broadcasters point out, why didn't they do that on their main channel? why did 
they fire all  their talent?
 
their superficial bluster well underscores the ocean of inadequacy which lies 
beneath.
 
 
 
                                                                      paul 
vincent zecchino
 
manasota key, fl



************************************** See what's new at http://www.aol.com
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx