[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] VOA transmitter Dixon, CA.
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] VOA transmitter Dixon, CA.
- From: vroomski@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 04 Apr 2007 19:47:13 +0000
Charles,
Thanks for the interesting information on VOA Dixon. The hosts countries labor rate explains a lot along with the older equipment. I will be in the Dixon area in May and will take some pictures of the site. Last time I was out there AT&T had some kind of transmitting site near VOA.
Dennis,
Vancouver, WA
-------------- Original message --------------
From: Charles A Taylor <MWDXer@xxxxxxx>
> At 01:44 PM 4/4/2007 +0000, you wrote:
> >Charles,
> >
> >Why did VOA close down the Dixon transmitter site and not the Delano
> >site? The last time I was out a the Dixon site, (2002) the antennas and
> >cement building were still intact. A few livestock in the fields. Those
> >huge antennas where really something to look at.
> >
> >Dennis,
> >Vancouver, WA
>
> Dennis,
>
> When I was out at VOA Delano, one of our techs ("engineers," in
> broadcasting terms) was
> transferred to Delano from Dixon. I know something of Dixon's operations.
>
> Main reasons are:
>
> 1. Decline in HF BC listenership.
> 2. Dixon used older, less efficient transmitters. Harder to maintain
> and repair.
> 3. Programming to target countries has moved to IBB Saipan, IBB Thailand and
> IBB Sri Lanka.
> 4. Delano has 4, 250-kW Brown-Boveri with solid-state switching modulators.
> It also has 2 of the older Collins 821A 250-kW Collins "auto-tune" trans-
> mitters with class B modulators (Same as RCI Sackville has).
> 5. Expensive US labor costs. All of IBB's new transmitter site are overseas,
> and IBB pays a labor scale closer to the host country.
>
>
> IBB Greenville's Site A has gone dead, too. Same reason as for Dixon,
> except that
> some of the old transmitters are very inefficient.
>
> Charles
>
> Charles A Taylor, WD4INP
> Greenville, North Carolina
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original
> contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its
> editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx