[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] IBOC status in Washington DC area
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] IBOC status in Washington DC area
- From: "Bob Young" <youngbob53@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:31:14 -0500
I think the "jury" maybe has a conflict of interest,
Bob y\Young
Analog, Ma
>From: mwdxer@xxxxxxxxx (Patrick Martin)
>Reply-To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of
>America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: bds2@xxxxxxx, irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Mailing list for the
>InternationalRadio Club of America)
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] IBOC status in Washington DC area
>Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 10:28:18 -0800
>
>Brett,
>
>It is possible that Ibiguity changed their rules too. They want more
>stations to consider IBOC. If the fees are low and "one time" then more
>stations would be willing to go IBOC. If they had to cough up money
>every year, that may make a difference. After all, the jury is still out
>on IBOC. Most feel it is not viable and I agree there. But some in the
>industry are not convinced.
>
>73,
>
>Patrick
>
>Patrick Martin
>KAVT Reception Manager
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx