Re: [IRCA] NE Oregon TPs Feb. 6

[Arthur W Peterson <awpetersonrpf@xxxxxxxx>]

Yes!  My notes show a 1.5 sec dash for 2 of them and 3 sec dash on the
other.
Received in March of 1983

Art Peterson
Richmond, CA

On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 21:31:27 -0800 "Steve Ratzlaff" <steveratz@xxxxxxxx>
writes:
> Hi Art,
> I wondered that too--if it might be a fishnet locator. Do you 
> remember if 
> any of the ones you heard had a dash after the ident?
> Steve
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Arthur W Peterson" <awpetersonrpf@xxxxxxxx>
> To: <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 7:18 PM
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] NE Oregon TPs Feb. 6
> 
> 
> >I wonder if this GW5 beacon might be one of the fish net beacons?
> > Several years ago I logged these: 4ROS, O12, and GH6 in the 1700 
> kHz
> > range.
> >
> > Art Peterson
> > Richmond, CA
> >
> >
> > On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:00:52 -0800 "Steve Ratzlaff" 
> <steveratz@xxxxxxxx>
> > writes:
> >> Both PNG beacons 1725 GA and 1737 KUT were at weak level this
> >> morning. But
> >> somewhat more interesting is a new unknown beacon heard this
> >> morning. 1736
> >> GW5 with a long dash (like the Canadian LF NDB format) is 
> presently
> >> being
> >> heard. First noticed at 1512 utc, it's still fading up 
> periodically,
> >> 1554
> >> utc. Its carrier is on 1736 and the ident has been only heard on
> >> 1737 so
> >> far. An internet search so far has not turned up anything on the
> >> identity of
> >> this; nothing in my various LF beacon databases. I've been 
> recording
> >> it!
> >> Steve
> >> NE Oregon
> >> R75, E/W longwire, ALA100 100' NW/SE loop
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> IRCA mailing list
> >> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >>
> >> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of 
> the
> >> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion 
> of
> >> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >>
> >> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >>
> >> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >>
> >>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of 
> the 
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion 
> of the 
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> 
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of 
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> 
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> 
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx