[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] new bill may impact media
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] new bill may impact media
- From: "W. Curt Deegan" <WWWR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 15:32:24 -0500
One person's blowhard is another person's spokesman. Silencing
anyone regardless who "owns" the airwaves, is a travesty. No good
can come of it.
Music comes from satellites.
Curt
At 03:04 PM 1/22/2007, you wrote:
>OK, I was not very political in my younger years (even though I thought I
>was) but I do not remember political blowhards all over the dial back then,
>so to my way of thinking letting the blowhards spew their biased views all
>over the airwaves as "truth" was not necessarily a very positive outcome.
>There used to be music.
>
>Bob Young
>
> >From: "W. Curt Deegan" <WWWR@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Reply-To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of
> >America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >To: IRCA List <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >Subject: Re: [IRCA] new bill may impact media
> >Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 14:40:43 -0500
> >
> >That would be debatable. Below an excerpt from Wikipedia on the topic:
> >
> >"The Doctrine was enforced throughout the entire history of the FCC
> >(and its precursor, the Federal Radio Commission) until 1987, when
> >the FCC repealed it in its Syracuse Peace Council decision which was
> >upheld. The FCC held that the doctrine had grown to inhibit rather
> >than enhance debate and suggested that, due to the many media voices
> >in the marketplace at the time, the doctrine was probably
> >unconstitutional."
> >
> >Curt
> >
> >
> >At 02:24 PM 1/22/2007, you wrote:
> > >Well in all fairness, (pardon the pun), the fairness doctrine seemed to
> >work
> > >before didn't it?
> > >
> > >Bob Young
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >IRCA mailing list
> >IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> >Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> >original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> >IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> >For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> >To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
>the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx