[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: "HD" DX?
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] [NRC-AM] Re: "HD" DX?
- From: Milspec390@xxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2007 14:38:26 EST
Neil and fellow DXers -
Right. It's not HD per se, it's where it's plopped. For years, didn't it
common sense relegate digital and/or broadband sigs to higher freqs? There so
many better ways to execute digital radio without destroying existing AM and FM
bands. Why the telling insistence upon 'slopped on channel - all over the
band'?
Wouldn't HD lose it's intrinsic shortcomings, were it shifted to higher
ground?
ibuckwitty is about money, period. They could care less about AM, FM, or
listeners. And listeners - forget DXers - haven't missed this sunny point. HD's
dingbat conception and slipshod outworking demonstrates pig ignorance of all
things radio. If iBuckwitty cared, would they pollute spectrum with digital
detritus, much less lie straightfacedly about obvious interference?
So long as HD jams from year to year, BigKorpseorate KronyKasters will stuff
iBiquity's seamy pockets with ill-gotten lucre until the last analog
competitor is brought to ruin - or so they think.
The only wild card is the American public, not quite so gullible as FatSuits
imagine them to be.
z
"The radio business is a cruel and shallow money trench, a long plastic
hallway where thieves and pimps run free and good men die like dogs. There is also
a negative side."
- Dr. Hunter S.
Thompson
pvz
manalog key, fl
27 line @ gulf of mexico
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx