Re: [IRCA] Info on 1610, 1020 and 590

["Neil Kazaross" <neilkaz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Very interesting, Bob. Certainly could be testing for Cuban use. Anyhow, the 
bearings posted by most, do seem to be to far north for central NJ.

73 KAZ
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Foxworth" <rfoxwor1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America" 
<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <ABDX@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; <am@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, December 01, 2006 10:03 AM
Subject: [IRCA] Info on 1610, 1020 and 590


>A posting on one of the BC lists within the hour states:
>
> 1610 was "legit and approved". 10 kW from an unspec east
> coast location. Content 1 kHz tone, nothing else (no hidden data etc).
>
> 1610 test is finished. Testing now on 1020, look tonight and
> Sat night. Then testing on 590 from Tue to Friday. Then, done.
>
> The purpose, authority  or location was not given by the poster.
>
> I am sure more detail will be forthcoming.
>
> Some BC people are looking at Ft. Monmouth NJ (home of an
> Army communications command) as a possible site based on
> some DFing they did with FIM-41s.
>
> Finally some are speculating this is in preparation for the
> presumed coming demise of el maximo in order to have
> radio assets set to deploy.
>
> - Bob       sent at 1103 est
>
>
> -- 
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.409 / Virus Database: 268.15.3/561 - Release Date: 12/1/2006
>
> 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx