[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IRCA] Worst Since Early August
- Subject: [IRCA] Worst Since Early August
- From: "John H. Bryant" <bjohnorcas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 09:03:16 -0800
Wow,
It was a classic bad part of an auroral event. Usually our dawn East
Asian signals just skim past the auroral oval, with the more westerly
(inland China)ones coming closest to the oval and the more easterly
ones from Japan further from hitting the oval. I'll bet that the
auroral oval is substantially larger today.... China was G*O*N*E,
Korea was Almost GONE and Japan was barely there. Like Walt, I only
had 9 in audio only 747, 774, 828 and 873 being strong enough to be
sure that the were NHK... and some of those by paralleling. Walt's
more detailed report shows that he heard more hets, by far, than I
did.... don't really understand that.... in theory, I have the better
location and the bigger antennas (until Walt goes to his place in the
Queen Charlotte Islands.... then....
ANYWAY, the conditions did let me concentrate on trying out my new
Misek/Lankford/Ratzlaff phaser and it sure is nice. It does really
help open up some of the "Zones of Death" near the awful Vancouver
powerhouses (phasing 600 really helps with 594, hitting 650 actually
helps eliminate QRM on 675 Viet Nam, etc.) The most fun so far was
phasing down KCBS on 740... a coastal effect powerhouse here.... and
hearing CBX, Edmonton very well. I paralleled CBX up with their
internet somewhat delayed "live" internet feed. Oh, what high tech
fun!!! Its easier to phase out things in the lower band than the
upper, but I can do both and, as I remember, its almost alw3ays
easier to phase at the bottom of the dial than at the top... VERY
nice unit. Wil report a bit more on the phaser later today.
JOhn B.
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx