[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] QSLing
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] QSLing
- From: "Doug Pifer-desert4wd.com" <oregon4wd@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2006 03:50:10 -0700
Jim,
These are good points and particularly, the second sentence is how I try to
approach things. I probably send 2-3 reports a year depending on the
circumstances of the catch and typically, if the catch has raised my blood
pressure (excitement) then I seem to exibit that in my report. I think it's
important to express that I feel my reception was exceptional and I'm really
happy to have heard their station. Usually I am if I'm going through the
effort to write a report. Of the last 20 reports I've sent over the last
several years, I've received a verification for all of them- with the
exception of some scheduled tests - which probably sounds odd. I used to
add a P.S. requesting a sticker or something, but I don't do that anymore.
I suppose I wouldn't know, but that request may stall or hinder the
verification entirely. Oddly enough, I've sent out a few reports to some of
the old clear channel stations that I used to easily hear but can't now. I
should have done that years ago and wish I would have but, oh well...they're
more "valuable" catches to me now.
73- Doug
> One thing I do think is that I could write a better reception report NOW
> than I could when I was much younger. Maybe because I understand the
> concept of 'making someone want to reply' better now - hi hi.
> Jim Nall - Louisville
> http://www.n4fxc.com
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx