Re: [IRCA] # TPs with audio

["Bill Block" <billwblock@xxxxxxx>]

Walt, I got no JOAK-594 for the first time in a long time.  The only thing I 
heard on 594 was IBOC hash from KMJ-580

Bill Block Prescott Valley, AZ
>From: Walter Salmaniw <salmaniw@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of 
>America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of 
>America<irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>Subject: Re: [IRCA] # TPs with audio
>Date: Sun, 15 Oct 2006 07:55:54 -0700
>
>At 06:58 AM 10/15/2006, you wrote:
>
> >Audio on 747, 774 and 828 at 1320-1328.  No other audio or carriers were
> >heard.
> >Bill Block
> >Prescott Valley, AZ
>
>Bill, things weren't great either on the coast with audios on just 9, with 
>the Japanese being the main players:  531 (late audio at 14:34 probably 
>DU), 567 NHK1 briefly at 13:45 with a nice signal, 594 NHK1 peaking at good 
>strength at 14:27, 612 prob 4QR, 747 NHK2, 774 NHK2 (the best of the 
>NHK2s), 828 (NHK2), 1548 very weak audio around 13:40 ?DU?, 1566 HLAZ heard 
>early at fair levels, and 1575 VOA presumed at weak level around 13:40.
>
>Nick commented on 774 yesterday.  I wonder if I'm hearing the same growling 
>audio.  There is a carrier about 100 Hz higher, plus what I'm assuming is a 
>local switching power supply or something mostly ruining this otherwise 
>good frequency.  It's better using LSB, as the noise is on the high side.  
>Another question:  I'm consistently, just about daily, hearing a carrier on 
>638.9 or so in addition to 639.  Any ideas who this is?  Fiji was heard 
>well early this season, but I don't recall whether they were low or not.  I 
>kind of don't think so.......Walt Salmaniw, Victoria
>
>
>--
>No virus found in this outgoing message.
>Checked by AVG Free Edition.
>Version: 7.1.408 / Virus Database: 268.13.4/476 - Release Date: 10/14/2006
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>IRCA mailing list
>IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
>Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the 
>original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the 
>IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
>For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
>To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx