[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] TPs in the East
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] TPs in the East
- From: Barry McLarnon <bdm@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 17:23:45 -0400
On Monday 11 September 2006 00:43, Chuck Hutton wrote:
> Barry:
>
> Here's my idea of what you likely were receiving. That's a very impressive
> list of TP signals from your neck of the woods.
>
> MIA: all the big gun Japanese signals like 594, 693, 774, etc.
>
>
> Chuck
>
> 612 Australia very likely - strong here
> 657 Likely NZ but NK is possible - sometimes good
> 702 Australia is likely - sometimes strong
> 738 Australia is likely - sometimes good
> 756 NZ likely - sometimes good
> 792 Australia likely - can be strong
> 819 Likely NZ which can be good but maybe NK
> 873 Normally Japan but Aus likely for you
> 882 Not much is heard here. NZ, Japan and NK sometimes heard.
> 909 Likely NZ - often fair but not strong
> 927 Occasionally weak Aus - very surprising frequency
> 936 Aus likely
> 945 Puzzling, normally China here with only occasional DU
> 954 Japan but occasionally Aus - a bit surprising
> 1035 NZ - regular
> 1071 Puzzling, normally Japan with 1 or 2 Aus receptions
> 1116 Aus sometimes strong
> 1503 NZ regular but not strong
> 1512 Normally Aus but not strong
> 1521 Odd. Only 1 Aus log by the Grayland crew. Not-so-powerful Japan is
> normal
> 1539 Another odd one. China-Japan-Taiwan are heard here, none have great
> signals.
> 1548 Aus
> 1566 Assume you had HLAZ - the only case here where it seems likely you
> had a TP although this could be the 5 kw Aussie we hear often.
> 1593 Strange. Of the dozens of Grayland logs on this freq, there's 1 from
> Aus and 1 from NZ. Neither of those has any real power. Dunno what this
> was.
Thanks for the interesting analysis! I agree that it appears I was not
getting any northern TP signals - although I was skipping through the
channels rather quickly, it's unlikely that I would miss all of the big JJ
signals. And it's entirely possible that my 1566 was not HLAZ, despite the
apparent carrier frequency match-up. I should also mention that some
channels that would likely otherwise appear in my list are MIA due to local
signals or local narrowband noise sources (you've heard some of those in my
LA recordings, and they're worse than ever!)... one example is 1098, which
was completely blotto here at the time.
Barry
--
Barry McLarnon VE3JF Ottawa, ON
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx