Re: [IRCA] 01-02-03-04-05-06.
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] 01-02-03-04-05-06.



Boy!  To think Ken accused me of having too much time on my hands.

All I did was cut and paste.  I almost feel negligent. ;-)

Curt

At 09:45 PM 4/4/2006, you wrote:
> >
> > The international standard (ISO 8601) for date notation is YYYY-MM-DD
> > (see http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/~mgk25/iso-time.html).  So, the magic
>time
> > really should be 2006-05-04 03:02:01, in the wee hours of May 4.  I
>don't
> > plan to be up to observe the occasion!
> >
> > Barry
>
>
>It really does make sense to list it this way, as when you use
>that format to identify a file, it will sort properly across years
>(if you call the year 06) and even centuries (if you use all 4
>digits) because then the year becomes the most-significant-bit,
>as it should be, and not the day or month. Computer programmers
>have known this for decades.
>
>I've noticed more and more DXers use this to identify their
>loggings. I think sorting first by freq and then date makes a
>lot of sense. (e.g. 00970_20060402_WBUZZ_remarks)
>as someone here now does.
>
>As far as the "magic time" is concerned, we in this country
>cling to the peculiar, absurd notion of counting to twelve,
>twice, to describe a single 24 hour day, instead of the
>logical and natural step of counting to 24 once. This means
>there would have to be TWO "magic days" so not to worry,
>if you miss one, there will be another that afternoon. Some-
>what less special than it deserves to be. Then in Chicago,
>it comes an hour later, and in Indiana .... who knows, now?
>
>You should reckon the "magic time" in UTC, actually, as
>they do with leap years, then you're guaranteed to have it
>once, everywhere.
>
>- Bob                        sent at 2145 edt


_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx