[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Looks as if KBLI-1620 is no more
Cheers for the clarification
Barry
Scott Fybush <scott@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
No - WQSN stays. Its sister station, WKLZ 1470, is (or will very soon
be) gone.
s
BARRY DAVIES wrote:
> OK Scott thank you for the clarification on 1620 KBLI IE it has gone for
> a long time. Thank goodness I QSLed this one a couple of years ago hi!
> Can you clarify if * 1660 WQSN Kalamazoo MI be history soon?*
> Barry
>
> */Scott Fybush /* wrote:
>
> Nope - the license has been surrendered, and at the moment, the FCC has
> no interest in issuing new X-band licenses. Until that changes (and it
> appears to be right at the bottom of the priority list), 1620 Idaho is
> simply gone.
>
> (The license surrender was part of the transfer of ownership
- with the
> five-year deadline looming for a decision on whether to keep 690 or
> 1620, there was no point paying the filing fees and so on to transfer a
> license that was just going to expire a month later, anyway. Same deal
> with 1470 in Kal! amazoo, Michigan, which is going away, if it
> hasn't done
> so already, as part of the sale of a cluster of stations there.)
>
> s
>
> BARRY DAVIES wrote:
> > Radioandrecords.com say station group has been sold. So may come
> back
> > under new ownership?
> > Barry
> >
> > */Amdxmail@xxxxxxx/* wrote:
> >
> >
> > e-dxn's AM Switch, posted today, brings the unwelcome news that
> > KBLI-1620 in Blackfoot, Idaho has been deleted. An AM query under
> > "Blackfoot" on the FCC's site indeed turns up only the 690 station.
>
> s
>
_______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Po! st a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing
staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx