Re: [IRCA] KAZ versus Pennant/Flag

[Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx>]

And....are the Asian signals (their carriers) actually stronger on 
the Kaz than on the Superloop, or is the "carrier to noise" ratio 
better on the Kaz?    You should be able to tell that by looking at 
small portion of the Elad's display

If the interference level (noise / domestic splatter) is higher on 
the Superloop, the DX won't be as readable, even if its signal 
strength from the Asians is better.

This goes back to what some have been mentioning, that ability to 
null broadly and in a certain direction is often more important than 
aiming the antenna at the DX.


best wishes,

Nick


At 17:02 2018-10-25, Neil Kazaross wrote:
> Craig I am surprised that JJ's are so much better on your KAZ that is aimed
> at least 40 deg from them than on your Superloop basically aimed right at
> them. Your Superloop is 45 x 20 ft so 900 sq ft under it.
>
> What is the height (bottom wire to apex) of your 72 ft KAZ?  73 KAZ worried
> something might be wrong with connections to your Superloop.
>
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 11:24 AM Mark Durenberger <Mark4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Mark.  Kaz reminds us that D-KAZ Aspect Ratio is important to a good
> > EZNEC result so, presumably, the same is true in real antenna life.
> >
> > One of the measurement runs I've made for the upcoming D-KAZ Cookbook
> > compared two different apex heights.
> >
> >
> > Cheers!
> >
> > Mark Durenberger
> >
> >

Nick Hall-Patch
Victoria, BC
Canada 

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx