--- Begin Message ---
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] CO TP Report 10/22/18
- From: C B <bevdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 17:02:23 +0000 (UTC)
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1540227747; bh=kU2frQeMPeD1iOF1JNFdnWLVCMZ6qdH9Rf3TFJ3Y7dk=; h=Date:From:To:In-Reply-To:References:Subject:From:Subject; b=Y80BMHK1Z5yKgRbRbniSa5sKrmuWBNABHOHureC5SOB/6ZO/rvPUWUvZ2/rUHVWdMiYm3DN27Cw27faOxR+tGNFpBIU54f/jYscbCjD6JHsdSH37eg0aeSI/2pvsdGM42RVEO92iULzFRntFjDbXs8KPD+VnB0JdS3MmfCUOZhgzqYL88RkPK7NMT44BVAo567zv0tlW6fUSRAwRxITKPL6Fd9LMuPDfuiLsbnWZpTR/va99SzNjJranN07Bba235n6vm+1R0o47ccapHqT5Uw7Hq9u3luQBVf18NQvknPQcTg3hx8M4smiUV/Mo2tfLPZMkZ0Byl4k92xKDD07y7A==
Kaz,
I could use taller supports. Do you recommend 22 ft. height? I read where smaller DKAZ antennas might suffer from degraded lower band results. I just went off of a height to length ratio derived from previously published material. I appreciate your input!
Craig
On Monday, October 22, 2018, 10:49:03 AM MDT, Neil Kazaross <neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Craig, I fear this will be too small for the lower half of the band. Can
you use significantly taller vertical supports? I use these which
unfortunately cost 15 bucks more than when I bought a bunch.
https://store.kittyhawk.com/products/22ft-hvy-duty-tele-pole They spec 22
ft but mine measure about 23 ft when fully extended.
73 KAZ
On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 11:34 AM C B via IRCA <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: C B <bevdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc:
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:34:29 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] CO TP Report 10/22/18
>Â Kaz,
> The biggest DKAZ I can fit in will be about 84 ft., so my vertical
> supports will be at 28 ft. intervals and 13.2 ft. high. The DKAZ will be
> aimed at ~260 degrees. Unfortunately there's not a lot of wiggle room for
> me to work with. Per your recommendation, the bottom wire will be 2 ft.
> above the ground. I will use the Vactrol unit for termination.
> Thanks and 73,
> Craig BarnesWheat Ridge, CO
>Â Â On Monday, October 22, 2018, 9:01:35 AM MDT, Neil Kazaross <
> neilkaz58@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>Â Craig what dimensions do you plan for the DKAZ?
>
> Typical sunrise period morning here in IL. I start recording at 1158 and
> while doing so tune live to 1020 and KTNQ is coming in fine in SS with an
> LA street address given in ad. I notice a quite good carrier from 1017 on
> the other side of the spectral display (am in LSB to avoid most of WNVR
> super local slop). I tuned to 1017 and sure enough there's some weak island
> mx pushing past the slop.
>
> Later on 4QR 612 was quite readable, and I managed some audio on 702 and
> 738 but unlike yesterday when 3WV 594 was quite clear, there wasn't much
> from them today.
>
> If you want your DKAZ for DU, I suggest aiming further south right at them
> about 250 deg from Denver area. This should also reduce Asian QRM. Or
> perhaps even aim is somewhat further south.
>
> 73 KAZ
>
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2018 at 9:19 AM C B via IRCA <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: C B <bevdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
> > To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> > Cc:
> > Bcc:
> > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:19:05 +0000 (UTC)
> > Subject: CO TP Report 10/22/18
> > I listened from 1242 to 1315. LSR at 1318. No sign of JOBB this AM. As
> > reported by Richard Allen, certain signals only in briefly. Working on
> > switching the W KAZ out for a smaller W DKAZ. Then on to a N Flag or N
> > corner fed loop.
> > 594 JOAK weak w/time pips at 1300
> > 693 JOAB fair w/male and female, fanfare, sounded like EE lesson
> > 747 JOIB fair w/male and female, EE lesson
> > 774 JOUB good w/male and female, EE lesson
> > 972 HLCA fair w/male in KK? in briefly
> > 73 and Best of DX,
> > Craig BarnesWheat Ridge, CO
> > Elad FDM-S2, NW corner fed loop, Quantum Phaser
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > From: C B via IRCA <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: undisclosed-recipients:;
> > Cc: C B <bevdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Bcc:
> > Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 14:19:05 +0000 (UTC)
> > Subject: [IRCA] CO TP Report 10/22/18
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: C B via IRCA <irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America <
> irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: C B <bevdxer@xxxxxxxxx>
> Bcc:
> Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 16:34:29 +0000 (UTC)
> Subject: Re: [IRCA] CO TP Report 10/22/18
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
--- End Message ---