[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] WWV and WWVH to stick around for just a little bit longer

Wow, did I ever open up a can of worms with this one...

This is practically entertaining to see everyone get their blood pressure up over this issue.  Amusing, really.  :)

*sits back with a bowl of popcorn and watches the fur fly*

73,
Rick Dau
South Omaha, Nebraska EN21af
________________________________
From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Volodya S <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, September 30, 2018 1:51:52 PM
To: Mailing list for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: Re: [IRCA] WWV and WWVH to stick around for just a little bit longer

Says he, when the moment there's a huge solar storm, or, God help us, a
larger global event between powers, you can bet your bottom dollar that
satellites will be knocked off like flies on my swatter!    Walt

On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 6:49 PM Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I dont agree with it being wizzed away on that either.  But there's alot
> more reliable technology then HF for this kinda stuff
>
> Says a guy who lived in Alaska where HF was weak at best some days but
> satelitte stuff worked FINE
>
> Face it, the only folks I've seen complaining about WWV WWVH possibly going
> away is a bunch of DX'ers and ham radio guys. THe general public doesn't
> give a rats ass and doesn't need or use the service for the most part.
>  Why spent millions every year for a few thousand commercials users.. when
> again, satelitte stuff is much better?
>
> Paul
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 2:47 PM Volodya S <canswl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > Just think of what all of Trumps weekend golf trips to Key Largo costs
> you,
> > as an American taxpayer.  Yep, continue to piss away your hard earned tax
> > dollars ;-)     Walt (and glad to be a Canadian)
> > PS:  sorry to be off topic.   Won't happen again :-)
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 6:43 PM Paul B. Walker, Jr. <
> > walkerbroadcasting@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > > So just because its a drop in the bucket of the US budget we should
> just
> > > piss away a couple million bucks?
> > >
> > > paul
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2018 at 2:41 PM DXer <hfdxmonitor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > >  >Chuck Hutton Sun, 30 Sep 2018 10:54:45 -0700
> > > >
> > > >  >The military and aeronautical sectors believe GOS is reliable. It
> is
> > > >  >the primary basis of navigation systems for both.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You beat me to it, however, it must be said that it can, and
> sometimes
> > > > is, blocked/interfered with.
> > > >
> > > > It was around 2012, I was flying into Seoul, Souht Korea, and the
> North
> > > > was jamming the GPS signal. Localized, fair enough, but it can
> happen.
> > > >
> > > > We tend to always favor new technology, but old ones sometimes make a
> > > > come back, either for simplicity, or because nobody else is using it
> > > > anymore.
> > > >
> > > > I'm well aware that overtime you can fill a piggie bank with pennies,
> > > > but what's the percentage of this expense in the grand scheme of
> > things,
> > > > i.e., the US budget?
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > >
> > > > Vince
> > > > Ottawa, ON
> > > >
> > > > P.S.1. Ending Radio Canada International's shortwave service saved
> > > > money, but I'm still wondering if the savings were worth it.
> > > >
> > > > P.S.2. I'm of the opinion that 'straight' savings are applicable to
> > > > private endevours only. At a government level, other factors usually
> > > > come into play.
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > IRCA mailing list
> > > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > > >
> > > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
> the
> > > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > > >
> > > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > > >
> > > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > >
> > > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > IRCA mailing list
> > > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> > >
> > > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> > >
> > > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> > >
> > > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > IRCA mailing list
> > IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
> >
> > Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> > original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> > IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
> >
> > For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
> >
> > To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx