[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] IBOC/analog reception comparisons.
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] IBOC/analog reception comparisons.
- From: "Powell E. Way III W4OPW" <w4opw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:04:39 -0800 (PST)
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=0yriz3ZE6Dwj6oPjVMcoq0vyWbFTePE9CnRZcH7iXi3G+xx/nNf1VtZBpLC4xTiZT23p5zqzESXT98WOfrrbsUbdIicRwoVFZFLn3uB+uDKwexCSE4e4EwBC5BPqvWkSnRwe7J6UriZ+2tRPrTib2gebGEh6gI7DjoZFgTDviIE= ;
--- David Gleason <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Put a frame around those comments! Very nicely
> stated, Russ.
>
> Perception is reality, or why would people prefer
> the ultra compressed audio
> on an iPod to CDs and FM? It's because it's an iPod
> and it's digital!
AND their hearing is destroyed...... :(
Powell
w4opw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
NNNN!
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx