[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] IBOC/analog reception comparisons.
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] IBOC/analog reception comparisons.
- From: "Bill Harms" <wharms@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:41:45 -0500
- Content-description: Mail message body
- Priority: normal
Just curious, on what are you basing this conclusion?
Bill Harms
On 23 Nov 2005 at 14:30, David Gleason wrote:
> It is about using a delivery system that is perceived as not being
> antiquated. Analog is perceived as antiquated by the consumer.
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://arizona.hard-core-dx.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx