[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Revitalization and Interference: Fact vs. Science Fiction



While the proposed changes may indeed be promising and beneficial, there's another bogeyman contributing heavily to the problem and also dating back to the 1960's.


It's the wrongheaded and failed idea that more stations provide more service or that more power provides more service.


The steady rise in interference problems arose as much or more from over-saturation of stations overall, stations operating at night in particular, and the promotion of greater powers in the name of fighting interference. than from the causes cited in the article.


Those factors in turn led to many failing stations being purchased by stronger ones or by the large group owners, only to become essentially "satellators".


Maybe AM needs the kind of concentration the FCC is forcing onto TV broadcasters as a means of thinning the herd.



Russ Edmunds

WB2BJH

Blue Bell, PA

Grid FN20id

________________________________
From: IRCA <irca-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Dennis Gibson <wb6tnb@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 5:54:17 PM
To: Mailing List for the International Radio Club of America
Subject: [IRCA] Revitalization and Interference: Fact vs. Science Fiction

http://www.radioworld.com/columns-and-views/0004/revitalization-and-interference-fact-vs-science-fiction/339609

Sent from my iPad
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx