[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IRCA] Father of radio

Subject: Re: [IRCA] Father of radio
From: Richard N Allen <richarda@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2016 05:51:59 -0600
Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I never said I "do not consider radiotelegraphy to be radio".  All I did was post the web address of an article emailed by Radio Canada International yesterday.  My message gave no opinion and was not meant to stir controversy!!!   

Richard Allen.

Sent from my iPad

> On Dec 24, 2016, at 00:08, Stephen Hanes <endeavor29@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Richard N. Allen, why do you not consider radiotelegraphy to be radio? Actually Merriam-Webster online gives the etymology of âradioâ to be âradiotelegraphy.â
> 
> Steve Hanes -- K4VWS -- NW Tennessee
> AOR 7030+, R7(A), DSR-2, HQ-140X


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca

Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers

For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org

To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References:
- [IRCA] Father of radio
  - From: Stephen Hanes

Prev by Date: [IRCA] Alaska AM DX 1000UTC 12-23
Next by Date: [IRCA] Oklahoma TP DX 12/24/16
Previous by thread: [IRCA] Father of radio
Next by thread: [IRCA] Eagle 810
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread