[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IRCA] Oklahoma TP DX 12/10/16.
- Subject: Re: [IRCA] Oklahoma TP DX 12/10/16.
- From: Walter Salmaniw <canswl@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2016 17:14:06 +0000
- Delivered-to: archive@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FC5NmkTT/+dUDz7gH9NM2uETB93GOvcjA5KBbJyX0No=; b=aOJoAdn6gS6zUzmGEMhidfT4+2m3ScCpqhMT69cD+ZhNeoqhzvGBMpmIR/dmKGfX39 gJJKncHNQxlCd797ZTJy7ImPcXnKuNmNdomppW+EaLBikdnIphEW2G+jtrpH3K2sfO3x /f7A/V7scpZbMhSvuMC+CppLEWYBzFJwr4qfn4yL0Fnq/SMvYCWVOPt4TSO5P4MpMtND 8jPwR0CnZ01WfVeGoOmkl+pgpyGu6lhpeKue0p65A+bxE62IDKtAnNQZAK1YwMhXxQAr rCzPZ8D1N5vguUze/2qMNC0xvKkWU8ZV/0/6o9AxlyK31lSshfweuBZHuqyK9+UZDHfc tzJw==
I happened to return home from a delivery before 10:00 UTC, and the
spectrum was pretty full with Japanese signals, but 1st tier stations
only. Not a peep from 738 or Australia that I could see. 594 was the
strongest, with 747, then 774 next in line. Very good reception of 594.
73, Walt Salmaniw, Victoria, BC
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 3:36 PM, Nick Hall-Patch <nhp@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So far (1530UT), they've been having a pretty tough time on this side of
> the Rockies as well, though there seems to be a small lift happening now.
> Not like yesterday at all.
>
> best wishes,
>
> Nick
>
>
>
>
> At 13:40 10-12-16, you wrote:
>
>> Again this morning, no TP signals managed to pass over the Rockies (LST
>> at 1332).
>>
>> Richard Allen,
>> near Perry OK USA,
>> Skywave + 8-inch FSL.
>>
>> Sent from my iPad
>>
>> --
>> This message has been scanned for viruses and
>> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
>> believed to be clean.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> IRCA mailing list
>> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>>
>> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
>> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
>> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>>
>> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>>
>> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>
> Nick Hall-Patch
> Victoria, BC
> Canada
> _______________________________________________
> IRCA mailing list
> IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
>
> Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the
> original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the
> IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
>
> For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
>
> To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
_______________________________________________
IRCA mailing list
IRCA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://montreal.kotalampi.com/mailman/listinfo/irca
Opinions expressed in messages on this mailing list are those of the original contributors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the IRCA, its editors, publishing staff, or officers
For more information: http://www.ircaonline.org
To Post a message: irca@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx